Age-related differences in the attentional white bear

The cognitive aging literature suggests that aging populations exhibit impairments in the proactive inhibition of attention. Although proactive inhibition is often preceded by the allocation of attention toward the predicted or known spatial location of to-be-ignored stimuli, proactive allocation of attention has not been assessed in aging populations. In this study, an older and younger cohort engaged in the attentional-white-bear paradigm which measures proactive allocation of attention. In this task, on 80% of trials, participants must identify a centrally located letter surrounded by congruent or incongruent flanker letters. The flanker locations are fixed and predictable within each block of the study. On 20% of trials, they must identify which of two dots appear first on the screen. One dot appears in the same location as the flanker, and one appears in an empty location during the flanker task. The typical white-bear effect is that, despite the dots appearing at the same time, participants more often report the dot in the location of the flanker (i.e., the potentially to-be-ignored location) to appear first. The magnitude of this effect is interpreted as the magnitude of attentional allocation prior to inhibition. In Experiment 1, there was no difference in the magnitude of the attentional white bear between younger and aging cohorts. However, when the attentional system was sufficiently taxed by reducing the flanker presentation (Experiments 2a and 2b), age-related differences emerged. In particular, older participants showed a reduced white-bear effect, reflecting a potential impairment in the proactive allocation of attention toward the location of expected distractors.

Saccades curve away from previously inhibited locations: evidence for the role of priming in oculomotor competition

The oculomotor system serves as the basis for representing concurrently competing motor programs. Here, we examine whether the oculomotor system also keeps track of the outcome of competition between target and distractor on the previous trial. Participants had to perform a simple task of making a saccade toward a predefined direction. On two-thirds of the trials, an irrelevant distractor was presented to either the left or right of the fixation. On one-third of the trials, no distractor was present. The results show that on trials without a distractor, saccades curved away from the empty location that was occupied by a distractor on the previous trial. This result was replicated and extended to cases when different saccade directions were used. In addition, we show that repetition of distractor location on the distractor-present trials results in a stronger curvature away and in a shorter saccade latency to the target. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence that the oculomotor system automatically codes and retains locations that had been ignored in the past to bias future behavior.

African grey parrots ( Psittacus erithacus ) use inference by exclusion to find hidden food

Exclusion allows the detection of hidden food when confronted with the choice between an empty and a potentially baited food location. However, exclusion may be based on avoidance of the empty location without drawing inferences about the presence of the food in the baited location. So far, such inferences have been demonstrated in the great apes only: after seeing an experimenter eating one of two food types, which both had been hidden previously in two boxes, the apes were able to choose the box that still contained the other food type. African grey parrots are capable of exclusion, and we here assessed if they are capable of inference by exclusion. In our task, two different but equally preferred food items were hidden in full view of the birds under two opaque cups. Then, an experimenter secretly removed one food type and showed it to the bird. Similarly to the apes, one out of seven parrots significantly preferred the baited cup; control conditions rule out that its choice was based on associative learning or the use of olfactory cues. Thus, we conclude that—like the apes—some grey parrots are able to infer the location of a hidden food reward.