logarithmic residue
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-182
Author(s):  
Roman Pukhtaievych ◽  
Sergiy Plaksa

Abstract We consider monogenic functions taking values in a three-dimensional commutative algebra A2 over the field of complex numbers with one- dimensional radical. We calculate the logarithmic residues of monogenic functions acting from a three-dimensional real subspace of A2 into A2. It is shown that the logarithmic residue depends not only on zeros and singular points of a function but also on points at which the function takes values in ideals of A2, and, in general case, is a hypercomplex number.


2014 ◽  
Vol 150 (9) ◽  
pp. 1607-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Granger ◽  
Mathias Schulze

AbstractWe introduce a dual logarithmic residue map for hypersurface singularities and use it to answer a question of Kyoji Saito. Our result extends a theorem of Lê and Saito by an algebraic characterization of hypersurfaces that are normal crossing in codimension one. For free divisors, we relate the latter condition to other natural conditions involving the Jacobian ideal and the normalization. This leads to an algebraic characterization of normal crossing divisors. As a side result, we describe all free divisors with Gorenstein singular locus.


2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOUKO MICKELSSON ◽  
SYLVIE PAYCHA

AbstractWe show that the residue density of the logarithm of a generalized Laplacian on a closed manifold defines an invariant polynomial-valued differential form. We express it in terms of a finite sum of residues of classical pseudodifferential symbols. In the case of the square of a Dirac operator, these formulas provide a pedestrian proof of the Atiyah–Singer formula for a pure Dirac operator in four dimensions and for a twisted Dirac operator on a flat space of any dimension. These correspond to special cases of a more general formula by Scott and Zagier. In our approach, which is of perturbative nature, we use either a Campbell–Hausdorff formula derived by Okikiolu or a noncommutative Taylor-type formula.


1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-596
Author(s):  
P. Kravanja ◽  
R. Cools ◽  
A. Haegemans

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Kytmanov ◽  
S. G. Myslivets

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document