brandt semigroup
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Matthew D. G. K. Brookes

We study congruences on the partial automorphism monoid of a finite rank free group action. We determine a decomposition of a congruence on this monoid into a Rees congruence, a congruence on a Brandt semigroup and an idempotent separating congruence. The constituent parts are further described in terms of subgroups of direct and semidirect products of groups. We utilize this description to demonstrate how the number of congruences on the partial automorphism monoid depends on the group and the rank of the action.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Mikhail V. Volkov

We present a new proof for the main claim made in the author's paper "On the identity bases of Brandt semigroups" (Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap., 14, no.1 (1985), 38–42); this claim provides an identity basis for an arbitrary Brandt semigroup over a group of finite exponent. We also show how to fill a gap in the original proof of the claim in loc. cit.


Author(s):  
Olufemi J. Ogunsola ◽  
Ifeyinwa E. Daniel

Abstract In this article the pseudo-amenability and pseudo-contractibility of restricted semigroup algebra $l_r^1(S)$ and semigroup algebra, l1(Sr) on restricted semigroup, Sr are investigated for different classes of inverse semi-groups such as Brandt semigroup, and Clifford semigroup. We particularly show the equivalence between pseudo-amenability and character amenability of restricted semigroup algebra on a Clifford semigroup and semigroup algebra on a restricted semigroup. Moreover, we show that when S = M0(G, I)is a Brandt semigroup, pseudo-amenability of l1(Sr) is equivalent to its pseudo-contractibility.


2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Margolis ◽  
John Rhodes ◽  
Pedro V. Silva
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650021
Author(s):  
Jitender Kumar ◽  
K. V. Krishna

The syntactic semigroup problem is to decide whether a given finite semigroup is syntactic or not. This work investigates the syntactic semigroup problem for both the semigroup reducts of [Formula: see text], the affine near-semiring over a Brandt semigroup [Formula: see text]. It is ascertained that both the semigroup reducts of [Formula: see text] are syntactic semigroups.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 1289-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER R. JONES

The five-element Brandt semigroup B2 and its four-element subsemigroup B0, obtained by omitting one nonidempotent, have played key roles in the study of varieties of semigroups. Regarded in that fashion, they have long been known to be finitely based. The semigroup B2 carries the natural structure of an inverse semigroup. Regarded as such, in the signature {⋅, -1}, it is also finitely based. It is perhaps surprising, then, that in the intermediate signature of restriction semigroups — essentially, "forgetting" the inverse operation x ↦ x-1 and retaining the induced operations x ↦ x+ = xx-1 and x ↦ x* = x-1x — it is not only nonfinitely based but inherently so (every locally finite variety that contains it is also nonfinitely based). The essence of the nonfinite behavior is actually exhibited in B0, which carries the natural structure of a restriction semigroup, inherited from B2. It is again inherently nonfinitely based, regarded in that fashion. It follows that any finite restriction semigroup on which the two unary operations do not coincide is nonfinitely based. Therefore for finite restriction semigroups, the existence of a finite basis is decidable "modulo monoids". These results are consequences of — and discovered as a result of — an analysis of varieties of "strict" restriction semigroups, namely those generated by Brandt semigroups and, more generally, of varieties of "completely r-semisimple" restriction semigroups: those semigroups in which no comparable projections are related under the generalized Green relation 𝔻. For example, explicit bases of identities are found for the varieties generated by B0 and B2.


Author(s):  
Maysam Maysami Sadr

We show that Banach semigroup algebras of any two Brandt semigroups over a fixed group are Morita equivalence with respect to the Morita theory of self-induced Banach algebras introduced by Grønbæk. As applications, we show that the bounded Hochschild (co)homology groups of Brandt semigroup algebras over amenable groups are trivial and prove that the notion of approximate amenability is not Morita invariant.


2007 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 655-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANN DOOMS ◽  
PAULA M. VELOSO

In this article, we introduce the normalizer [Formula: see text] of a subset X of a ring R (with identity) in the unit group [Formula: see text] and consider, in particular, the normalizer of the natural basis ±S of the integral semigroup ring ℤ0S of a finite semigroup S. We investigate properties of this normalizer for the class of semigroup rings of inverse semigroups, which contains, for example, matrix rings, in particular, matrix rings over group rings, and partial group rings. We also construct free groups in the unit group of an integral semigroup ring of a Brandt semigroup using a bicyclic unit.


2007 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Gould

The S-rank (where ‘S’ abbreviates ‘sandwich’) of a right congruence ρ on a semigroup S is the Cantor-Bendixson rank of ρ in the lattice of right congruences ℛ of S with respect to a topology we call the finite type topology. If every ρ ϵ ℛ possesses S-rank, then S is ranked. It is known that every right Noetherian semigroup is ranked and every ranked inverse semigroup is weakly right Noetherian. Moreover, if S is ranked, then so is every maximal subgroup of S. We show that a Brandt semigroup 0(G, I) is ranked if and only if G is ranked and I is finite.We establish a correspondence between the lattice of congruences on a chain E, and the lattice of right congruences contained within the least group congruence on any inverse semigroup S with semilattice of idempotents E(S) ≅ E. Consequently we argue that the (inverse) bicyclic monoid B is not ranked; moreover, a ranked semigroup cannot contain a bicyclic -class. On the other hand, B is weakly right Noetherian, and possesses trivial (hence ranked) subgroups.Our notion of rank arose from considering stability properties of the theory Ts of existentially closed (right) S-sets over a right coherent monoid S. The property of right coherence guarantees that the existentially closed S-sets form an axiomatisable class. We argue that B is right coherent. As a consequence, it follows from known results that TB is a theory of B-sets that is superstable but not totally transcendental.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document