Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

285
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By Cambridge University Press (CUP)

0899-367x

1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Halstead ◽  
A.E. Luloff ◽  
Thomas H. Stevens

Protest bids are often excluded during analysis of contingent valuation method data. It is suggested that this procedure might introduce significant bias. Protest bids are often registered by respondents who may actually place ahigher-orlower-than-average value on the commodity in question but refuse to pay on the basis of ethical or other reasons. Exclusion of protest bids may therefore bias willingness to pay (WTP) results, but the direction of bias is indeterminate a priori.


1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-97
Author(s):  
Carolyn R. Harper

Two issues lurk in the background of the papers by Lichtenberg, Taylor, and Cropper et al. The first is a specific question about the goal of regulatory policy. The second is a more global consideration regarding politics, technological change, and the future.


1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Lichtenberg

Pesticide regulation has become a topic of increasing interest in recent years, owing to rising public concerns about residues on foods, in drinking-water wells, and damage to wildlife. Public-opinion polls and political responses to incidents like the controversy over Alar suggest that demand for government intervention to protect public health and the environment from pesticides is high. Pesticides are toxic by design; survey evidence indicates that they are perceived as riskier than other, more common pollutants like auto exhaust (see, for example, Horowitz). Pesticide residues are not easily observable (short of laboratory analysis), making averting strategies by individuals extremely difficult and/or excessively costly to implement.


1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Park ◽  
John Loomis

This paper empirically tested the three conditions identified by McConnell for equivalence of the linear utility difference model and the valuation function approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Using a contingent valuation survey for deer hunting in California, two of the three conditions were violated. Even though the models are not simple linear transforms of each other for this survey, estimates of mean willingness to pay and their associated 95% confidence intervals around the mean were quite similar for the valuation methods.


1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian M. Alston ◽  
James A. Chalfant

The nonparametric approach to consumer-demand analysis—based on revealed-preference axioms—is reviewed. Particular attention is paid to questions of size and power of tests for consistency of data with the existence of a stable, well-behaved utility function that could have generated the data. An application to Australian meat demand is used to show how these notions can be quantified and how prior information about elasticities, following Sakong and Hayes, may be used to increase the power of the approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document