Foreign Medical Graduates and Graduate Medical Education

JAMA ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 246 (8) ◽  
pp. 854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis J. Goodman
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 870-872
Author(s):  
ANTOINETTE PARISI EATON ◽  
SAMUEL S. FLINT

In 1986 the Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME) was asked to advise the Congress of the supply and distribution of physicians in the United States, current and future shortages or excesses of physicians by specialty, issues relating to foreign medical graduates, and other matters relating to the financing and structure of undergraduate and graduate medical education. In 1988, the COGME Subcommittee on Physician Manpower stated to the Congress that "there appears to be an impending oversupply of pediatricians at present,"1 and the Subcommittee undertook—before making its final report to the Congress—its own independent study on manpower needs for pediatrics and six other specialties.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awad A. Ahmed ◽  
Wei-Ting Hwang ◽  
Charles R. Thomas ◽  
Curtiland Deville

ABSTRACT Background  Data show that international medical graduates (IMGs), both US and foreign born, are more likely to enter primary care specialties and practice in underserved areas. Comprehensive assessments of representation trends for IMGs in the US physician workforce are limited. Objective  We reported current and historical representation trends for IMGs in the graduate medical education (GME) training pool and US practicing physician workforce. Methods  We compared representation for the total GME and active practicing physician pools with the 20 largest residency specialties. A 2-sided test was used for comparison, with P < .001 considered significant. To assess significant increases in IMG GME trainee representation for the total pool and each of the specialties from 1990–2015, the slope was estimated using simple linear regression. Results  IMGs showed significantly greater representation among active practicing physicians in 4 specialties: internal medicine (39%), neurology (31%), psychiatry (30%), and pediatrics (25%). IMGs in GME showed significantly greater representation in 5 specialties: pathology (39%), internal medicine (39%), neurology (36%), family medicine (32%), and psychiatry (31%; all P < .001). Over the past quarter century, IMG representation in GME has increased by 0.2% per year in the total GME pool, and 1.1% per year for family medicine, 0.5% for obstetrics and gynecology and general surgery, and 0.3% for internal medicine. Conclusions  IMGs make up nearly a quarter of the total GME pool and practicing physician workforce, with a disproportionate share, and larger increases over our study period in certain specialties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document