Preferences for CPR and Life-Sustaining Treatment Among Nursing Home Residents

JAMA ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 275 (17) ◽  
pp. 1309
Author(s):  
Etienne Phipps
2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 714-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna N. Rahman ◽  
Matthew Bressette ◽  
Zachary D. Gassoumis ◽  
Susan Enguidanos

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 606-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyejin Kim ◽  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Christine Bradway ◽  
Susan E. Hickman

2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy L Meyers ◽  
Crystal Moore ◽  
Alice McGrory ◽  
Jennifer Sparr ◽  
Melissa Ahern

Author(s):  
Aluem Tark ◽  
Mansi Agarwal ◽  
Andrew W. Dick ◽  
Jiyoun Song ◽  
Patricia W. Stone

The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program was developed to enhance quality of care delivered at End-of-Life (EoL). Although positive impacts of the POLST program have been identified, the association between a program maturity status and nursing home resident’s likelihood of dying in their current care settings remain unanswered. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the POLST program maturity status on nursing home residents’ place of death. Using multiple national-level datasets, we examined total 595,152 residents and their place of death. The result showed that the long-stay residents living in states where the program was mature status had 12% increased odds of dying in nursing homes compared that of non-conforming status. Individuals residing in states with developing program status showed 11% increase in odds of dying in nursing homes. The findings demonstrate that a well-structured and well-disseminated POLST program, combined with a continued effort to meet high standards of quality EoL care, can bring out positive health outcomes for elderly patients residing in care settings.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aluem Tark ◽  
Mansi Agarwal ◽  
Andrew Dick ◽  
Jiyoun Song ◽  
Patricia Stone

Abstract Background: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program was developed to enhance quality of care delivered at end-of-life. Although positive impacts of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program use have been identified, the association between a state’s program maturity status and nursing home resident’s likelihood of dying in their current care settings, nursing homes, remain unanswered. Objective: Examine the impact of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Program maturity status on nursing home residents’ odds of dying in nursing homes.Methods: Program maturity status data were linked with multiple datasets: Minimum Data Set, Vital Statistics Data, Master Beneficiary Summary File, Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports, and Area Health Resource File. Stratifying residents on long-stay and short-stay, we used descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models for total 595,152 individuals.Results: Controlling for individual and contextual variables, long-stay nursing home residents living in states where the program was mature status had 20% increased odds of dying in nursing homes (OR: 1.20; CI 1.02-1.43) compared to those who resided in states with non-conforming status. Individuals residing in states with developing program status showed 11% increase in odds of dying in nursing homes (OR: 1.12; CI 1.02-1.24) compared to non-conforming status. No significant difference was noted for short-stay nursing home residents.Conclusion: Mature and developing maturity status were associated with greater likelihood of dying in nursing homes among long-stay residents. Our findings inform that a well-structured advance care planning program such as Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Program enhances care outcomes among older adults living in nursing homes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document