scholarly journals Goals‐of‐care Conversation Prevalence and Life‐Sustaining Treatment Preferences Among VA Nursing Home Residents with and without Dementia

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (S1) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
W. Scott ◽  
O. Intrator ◽  
C. Phibbs
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C Hanson ◽  
Mi-Kyung Song ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Robin Gilliam ◽  
Cherie Rosemond ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 714-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna N. Rahman ◽  
Matthew Bressette ◽  
Zachary D. Gassoumis ◽  
Susan Enguidanos

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 606-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyejin Kim ◽  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Christine Bradway ◽  
Susan E. Hickman

2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy L Meyers ◽  
Crystal Moore ◽  
Alice McGrory ◽  
Jennifer Sparr ◽  
Melissa Ahern

Author(s):  
Aluem Tark ◽  
Mansi Agarwal ◽  
Andrew W. Dick ◽  
Jiyoun Song ◽  
Patricia W. Stone

The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program was developed to enhance quality of care delivered at End-of-Life (EoL). Although positive impacts of the POLST program have been identified, the association between a program maturity status and nursing home resident’s likelihood of dying in their current care settings remain unanswered. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the POLST program maturity status on nursing home residents’ place of death. Using multiple national-level datasets, we examined total 595,152 residents and their place of death. The result showed that the long-stay residents living in states where the program was mature status had 12% increased odds of dying in nursing homes compared that of non-conforming status. Individuals residing in states with developing program status showed 11% increase in odds of dying in nursing homes. The findings demonstrate that a well-structured and well-disseminated POLST program, combined with a continued effort to meet high standards of quality EoL care, can bring out positive health outcomes for elderly patients residing in care settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 751-752
Author(s):  
Joan Carpenter ◽  
Robert Burke

Abstract Discussing and documenting goals of care and life-sustaining treatment decisions with seriously ill patients is a widely endorsed practice by healthcare and professional organizations. In 2018, The Veterans Health Administration (VA) initiated a new national policy to standardize such practices, the Life Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI), which included a coordinated set of evidence-based strategies and practice standards for conducting, documenting, and supporting high-quality goals of care conversations (GoCCs); staff training to enhance skills in conducting, documenting, and supporting GoCCs; standardized, durable electronic health record tools for documenting patients’ goals and preferences; and monitoring and information technology tools to support implementation and improvement. In this symposium, we will describe the first 20 months of implementing the LSTDI across the VA, the largest integrated healthcare system in the US. The first paper will focus on the factors associated with documentation of a GoCC and treatment preferences. The second paper will present findings describing facilitators and barriers to implementing the LSTDI and identifying factors that promote high rates of LSTDI documentation. The third paper examines patient level outcomes associated with a documented goal of comfort care, specifically the odds of receipt of hospice/palliative care, hospitalization, or ICU admission. This symposium will provide attendees with important information regarding a wide range of individual and system strategies to enhance the care of seriously ill older adults by engaging patients with serious illness in GoCCs and documenting their preferences for treatment in durable, easily accessible notes and orders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document