scholarly journals Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Operable Early-Stage Lung Cancer

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Timmerman ◽  
Rebecca Paulus ◽  
Harvey I. Pass ◽  
Elizabeth M. Gore ◽  
Martin J. Edelman ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Sridhar ◽  
Hiran C Fernando

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. This is related to the high prevalence and high mortality particularly when presenting at an advanced stage. Surgical resection remains the standard curative therapy for early-stage lung cancer. However, many patients are not able to tolerate resection secondary to poor respiratory reserve and other comorbid diseases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and percutaneous thermal ablation are minimally invasive techniques that have been used to treat other solid tumors with curative intent. Over the past decade, there has been an expansion in the roles of both SBRT and thermal ablation in the treatment of early-stage lung tumors. The encouraging results from several studies have led to the incorporation of these therapies, particularly SBRT, as the standard of care for curative-intent treatment of patients with medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. This chapter presents an overview of the approach to patient selection as well as provides a review of the current evidence for SBRT, percutaneous thermal ablation, and bronchoscopic ablation for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancers. This review contains 3 figures, 4 tables, and 28 references Key Words: stereotactic body radiation therapy, percutaneous thermal ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, endoscopic ablation, bronchoscopic ablation, radiofrequency ablation, early stage NSCLC therapy


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21010-e21010
Author(s):  
Daniel Przybysz

e21010 Background: Surgery remains the treatment of choice for early stage lung cancer. For patients without clinical conditions or those who refuse to this procedure, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is the treatment of choice. It is important to understand the patterns of treatment response and toxicities within this practice. Therefore, we aim to analyze and review our data on lung SBRT for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treated in our institution. Purpose: To describe response and toxicity patterns for NSCLC treatment with SBRT in a single third world country private institution. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from patients treated at a single private institution in Rio de Janeiro between January 2017 and May 2019. Inclusion criteria were histopathological diagnosis of NSCLC, 18 years old or older, SBRT treatment, who were closely followed-up according to international guidelines. All data was analyzed and reviewed by the radiation oncologist and medical oncologist responsible, as well as kept in a reliable way for future comparisons. Results: 121 patients were analyzed. 77 were excluded. Only patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 2017 to 2019 who received SBRT as primary treatment. The average age was 74 (56-94). The highest prevalence among patients were females 68% (n = 30). 26 patients were smokers (59%), 4 non-smokers (9%) and 14 patients were not recorded in the medical records. Molecular assessment for non-smokers will not be described in this study. Adenocarcinoma was the most common subtype (77%, n = 35), 15% were squamous cell carcinoma subtype (n = 7), 4.4% poorly differentiated (n = 2). The patients were distributed between early stage lung cancer and metastatic disease - foreseeing oligometastatic disease being continuously treated as potentially curable. 11 patients are not classified in the medical record. Twelve patients had metastasis: central nervous system (33%), lung (41%), bone (8.3%) and patients with more than two metastases 16.6% (bone and CNS, bone and lung). Eleven patients had adjuvant chemotherapy (QT) 25%. Ten of the patients (22%) had toxicities, all with different doses and SBRT fractions. Among them, cough was the most prevalent (40%); nausea / vomiting and rash accounted for 30%; pneumonitis accounted for 17%; and mucositis in 10% of patients. Of the 44 patients, 7 died. Conclusions: The study data corroborates the worldwide published literature. SBRT in treating early stage lung cancer is a safe and effective treatment modality, with acceptable low-grade toxicities and high response rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document