2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 300-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Peter Maziarz ◽  
Mark J. Stachowski ◽  
X Michael Liu ◽  
Linda Mosack ◽  
Ann Davis ◽  
...  

Energy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 118183
Author(s):  
Valentin Soloiu ◽  
Aliyah R. Knowles ◽  
Cesar E. Carapia ◽  
Jose D. Moncada ◽  
Justin T. Wiley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mamdouh S. Elmelawy ◽  
Asmaa El-Meligy ◽  
Hussien A. Mawgoud ◽  
Asmaa S. Morshedy ◽  
Samia A. Hanafy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jose F. Padilha ◽  
Roger Frety ◽  
Alane P. Santos ◽  
Luis A. M. Pontes ◽  
Marilia R. Santos ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Jacobsen ◽  
Otto M. Poulsen

Two lipolytic proteins (61 and 57 kDa) present in a Sephadex G-100 fraction of extracellular lipase from Geotrichum candidum ATCC 66592 were separated using high-performance liquid chromatography. Crossed electrofocusing immunoelectrophoresis was used to demonstrate that the 61-kDa lipase fraction contained two forms of lipase with pI 4.5 and 4.7. However, when deglycosylated with endoglycosidase H, the two forms gained an identical pI, 4.6. The 57-kDa lipase fraction contained one form of lipase with pI close to 4.5. Although the 61- and 57-kDa lipases were immunologically identical, the substrate specificity differed. Thus, the 61-kDa lipase hydrolysed palmitic acid methyl ester at an initial velocity of hydrolysis that was 60% of the initial velocity of hydrolysis of oleic acid methyl ester, whereas the 57-kDa lipase hydrolysed palmitic acid methyl ester at an initial velocity of hydrolysis that was only7% of the initial velocity of hydrolysis of oleic acid methyl ester. Key words: Geotrichum candidum, lipases, multiple forms, deglycosylation, substrate specificity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Farag ◽  
Mohamed H. M. Ahmed ◽  
Heba Yousef ◽  
A.-H. Abdel-Rahman

A crude acetone extract and oil of ripe fruits from Melia azedarach L. were evaluated against the 2nd and 4th instar larvae of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Both oil and extract exhibited highly significant growth inhibition at all concentrations tested, while the oil of M. azedarach recorded higher insecticidal activity against both instars than the crude extract. GC-MS analysis of the oil revealed the presence of linoleic acid methyl ester, oleic acid methyl ester, and free oleic acid as the main components in addition to hexadecanol, palmitic acid, methyl esters of stearic acid and myristic acid. Fatty acids and their esters were not only the main constituents of essential oil from the ripe fruits of M. azedarach, but also mainly responsible for the insecticidal and growth inhibition activity against S. littoralis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document