Intensive care sedation and analgesia for head-injury patients

Author(s):  
Miguel F Arango ◽  
Jorge H Mejia-Mantilla ◽  
Ravi Taneja
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. e0105
Author(s):  
Alia Marie Iqbal O’Meara ◽  
Nikki Miller Ferguson ◽  
Sidney E. Zven ◽  
Oliver L. Karam ◽  
Logan C. Meyer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1S) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Massimo Antonelli ◽  
Giorgio Conti ◽  
Andrea Belisari ◽  
Lucia S. D'Angiolella ◽  
Lorenzo Mantovani ◽  
...  

The goals and recommendations for ICU (Intensive Care Unit) patients’ sedation and analgesia should be to have adequately sedated patients who are calm and arousal, so that they can guarantee a proper evaluation and an adequate control of pain. This way, it is also possible to perform their neurological evaluation, preserving intellectual faculties and helping them in actively participating to their care. Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 receptor agonist, member of theraputical cathegory: “other hypnotics and sedatives” (ATC: N05CM18). Dexmedetomidine is recommended for the sedation of adult ICU patients who need a sedation level not deeper than arousal in response to verbal stimulation (corresponding to Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale 0 to -3). After the EMA approval, some European government authorities have elaborated HTA on dexmedetomidine, based on clinical evidence derived from Prodex and Midex trials. Dexmedetomidine resulted to be as effective as propofol and midazolam in maintaining the target depth of sedation in ICU patients. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation with dexmedetomidine was numerically shorter than with propofol and significantly shorter than with midazolam. The resulting favourable economic profile of dexmedetomidine supported the clinical use in ICU. Dexmedetomidine seems to provide clinical benefits due to the reduction of mechanical ventilation and ventilator weaning duration. Within the present review, an economic analysis of costs associated to the use of dexmedetomidine was therefore performed also in the Italian care setting. Thus, four different analyses were carried out based on the quantification of the total number of days in ICU, the time spent on mechanical ventilation, the weighted average number of days with mechanical ventilation or not and TISS points (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System). Despite the incremental cost for drug therapy associated with dexmedetomidine, a reduction of the management costs for ICU has been estimated, with savings ranging between € 800 and € 1,400 per patient. 


1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Charles G. H. West ◽  
Christopher Quirke ◽  
Louise Hall ◽  
Robert Taylor

SpringerPlus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen Bomberg ◽  
Heinrich V. Groesdonk ◽  
Martin Bellgardt ◽  
Thomas Volk ◽  
Andreas Meiser

2020 ◽  
pp. 3898-3905
Author(s):  
Michael C. Reade

Patients undergoing mechanical ventilation or other forms of invasive organ support in an intensive care unit should ideally be free of pain, anxiety, and delirium, sufficiently cooperative or sedated to enable safe delivery of essential aspects of their care; sufficiently awake such that tracheal extubation is not unnecessarily delayed; and left with few or no unpleasant memories of their illness and treatment. This ideal is often not achieved. Management should be based on an analgesia-first, delirium-control, sedation-minimization approach. Identifying intensive care unit-associated delirium is not straightforward: most delirious intensive care patients are not agitated, and ‘hypoactive’ delirium can mask substantial psychological distress. Various assessment scales can be used to quantitate, monitor, and communicate sedation and sedation goals, and similar tools can be employed to identify delirium.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document