Medication management for elderly patients in an academic primary care setting: A quality improvement project

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria V. Vejar ◽  
Mary Beth Flynn Makic ◽  
Ernestine Kotthoff-Burrell
Diabetes Care ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Acton ◽  
R. Shields ◽  
S. Rith-Najarian ◽  
B. Tolbert ◽  
J. Kelly ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 274-280
Author(s):  
Sam Appiah-Anane

With increasing number of biologics gaining approval from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for a wide variety of both cancer and non-cancer clinical indications in secondary care, the need for accurate medicines reconciliation in primary care also increases. The risk of patient harm from incomplete medicines reconciliation is a consideration, particularly when patient data is transferred from a secondary care setting to a primary care setting. As part of a prescribing quality improvement project, a list of biologics prescribed by secondary care providers were reconciled on to patients' primary care clinical systems (EMIS) by clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians at a Clinical Commissioning Groups. Patients were identified by cross-referencing high cost drug reports with clinical diagnostic codes (a mixture of READ codes and SNOMED-CT terms) on primary care clinical systems. In total, 192 medicines were reconciled safely on the relevant patients' notes across 16 different GP practices A further 81 medicines had already been reconciled at the start of the quality improvement project. The purpose of this article is three-fold; to expand the awareness of biologics in the context of medicines optimisation in the primary care arena, to discuss medicines reconciliations of biologics in primary care, including the role(s) of pharmacy professionals, and to discuss the wider implications of prescribing biologics in the light of ethical considerations such as veganism.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Zupancic ◽  
Siegfried Yu ◽  
Rajeev Kandukuri ◽  
Shilpa Singh ◽  
Anna Tumyan

Abstract Objectives Quality assurance/quality improvement projects are an important part of professional development in graduate medical education. The purpose of our quality improvement study was to evaluate whether (1) the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale questionnaire increases detection of anxiety and (2) the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology Self Report (QIDS-SR) increases detection of depression in a primary care setting. We also aimed to determine whether monitoring patients with depression or generalized anxiety using the QIDS-SR and GAD-7 scales influences treatment changes in the primary care setting. Methods Patients seen in a general internal medicine clinic between August 2008 and March 2009 were asked to fill out the QID-SR questionnaire and GAD-7 as part of a resident quality improvement project. We measured the prevalence of anxiety and depression during 6 months prior to the use of the GAD-7 and QIDS-SR instruments during the intervention period. We also compared the frequency of treatment changes initiated both 12 months prior to and during the intervention period. The aforementioned measures were performed with use of a retrospective chart review. Results The prevalence of anxiety was 15.2% in the pre-intervention period and 33.3% in the intervention period, and the prevalence of depression was 38.9% in the prescreening period and 54.8% during the screening period (P value for both was <0.001). The change in anxiety therapy was 21.6% in the prescreening period and 62.2% in the screening period (P  =  .028). The change in depression therapy was 23.2% in the pre-intervention period and 52.1% in the intervention period (P  =  .025). Conclusion Routine screening for depression and anxiety may help clinicians detect previously undiagnosed anxiety and depression and also may facilitate identification of needed treatment changes. Further work is needed to determine whether routine screening improves patient outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Tim Cooksley ◽  
◽  
Ben Lovell ◽  

As those working in Acute Medicine gather at SAMsterDAM2, the spring conference of the Society for Acute Medicine, the growth, reputation and global representation of the specialty continues to grow. Alongside, the traditional strongholds of the UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Denmark and Australia growth in Asia continues with an AMU now established in Pakistan among other countries. The global growth and interest in Acute Medicine is reflected in this issue of the journal, in which we are delighted to have a truly international cohort of authors. The papers in this issue add to the understanding of some of the fundamental tenets of the specialty key to delivering high quality acute medical care, including international adaptation of the AMU model of care, the Acute Medicine/Primary Care interface, the referral of older patients to Critical Care, readmissions and a reminder of the opportunities an acute medical admission presents to perform important health screening interventions. Rombach et al. describe the impact of implementing an AMU model of care in Amsterdam. The results of the first four years of the model mirror those seen following their introduction in the UK with improved patient flow and reduced length of stay with no effect on readmission rates. The crucial topic of trying to ensure and describe optimal transfer of clinical information between the Acute Medicine and Primary Care interface is addressed through a quality improvement project by Lockman et al. with an accompanying editorial by Professor Dan Lasserson. Their success highlights the opportunities to drive quality through multi-specialty working and innovative thinking. Nannan-Panday et al. examine the vital sign changes in readmitted patients. They describe that deterioration in key physiological signs is common in patients with unplanned readmissions and suggest early intervention through wearable technologies may be a strategy for reducing this adverse event. Bosch et al. retrospectively analyse the outcomes of elderly patients admitted to Intensive Care directly from the Emergency Department compared to those admitted from general wards finding the former group have better outcomes. This reinforces the importance of early decision making, particularly in elderly patients, so fundamental to the practice of Acute Medicine. Rice et al. report the results of a quality improvement project focusing on HIV testing in their Emergency Department at the world’s largest cancer hospital. They reflect that acute care specialties are uniquely positioned to influence clinical practice because of the large cross section of patients for whom it supports. As we as Acute Medicine practitioners reflect on what we are achieving and what there is to accomplish, we need to remind ourselves that the global footstep of our specialty is increasing and we have the opportunity to imprint its principles further in the acute care of medical patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther K. Chung ◽  
Ruth S. Gubernick ◽  
Marianna LaNoue ◽  
Diane J. Abatemarco

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document