Enhancement of Health Surveys with Data Linkage

Author(s):  
Cordell Golden ◽  
Lisa B. Mirel
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M A McMinn ◽  
P Martikainen ◽  
T Härkänen ◽  
H Tolonen ◽  
J Pitkänen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background As a consequence of declining levels of participation in health surveys, the results purported to be population-representative may be biased. Traditional adjustments for non-participation, such as weighting, can fail to correct for such biases. We aim to validate our developed methodology, which simulates non-participants, and compare results from the inferred sample to the ’gold standard’ sample of participants and true non-participants, and participants alone. Methods Participants and non-participants of the Finnish Health 2000 survey, and a contemporaneous population sample are available, with alcohol-related hospitalisations and deaths (“harms”, individually record-linked for all Health 2000 invitees). Synthetic observations on non-participants were simulated through comparison of participants and population sample. Alcohol consumption of true and inferred non-participants were multiply imputed based on harms and education as well as age and sex, assuming data are Missing At Random (MAR). Results are compared via the relative differences (RD) between the inferred sample and 1) gold standard sample, and 2) participants alone. Results Average weekly estimates for men are 129g in the inferred sample, and 130g in the gold standard (RD -1.2%, 95%CI -2.0, -0.4%), and 35g for women in both samples (RD -0.8%; -1.9, 0.3%). Estimates for men with secondary levels of education had the greatest RD (-1.9%; -3.3, -0.5%). Comparisons between the participants and the inferred sample revealed few differences. Conclusions All RD between the inferred and gold standard samples lie within our ±5% acceptability limits, in support of the use of our methodology for adjusting for non-participation in health surveys. However, under MAR, there are no significant differences between the results generated from the inferred sample and the participants alone. Further work exploring Missing Not At Random scenarios is required to ensure utility for reliable population health monitoring. Key messages Survey weights alone cannot adjust for non-representativeness, but we have shown that data linkage can be used to match the characteristics and outcomes of the selected sample. Non-participation in health surveys may be adjusted for using our methodology, with further exploration into alternative missing data scenarios required.


Author(s):  
Tony Whiffen ◽  
Ashley Akbari ◽  
Tony Paget ◽  
Sarah Lowe ◽  
Ronan Lyons

IntroductionPopulation health surveys are used to record person-reported outcome measures for chronic health conditions and provide a useful source of data when evaluating potential disease burdens. The reliability of survey-based prevalence estimates for chronic diseases is unclear nonetheless. This study applied methodological triangulation via a data linkage method to validate prevalence of selected chronic conditions (angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and asthma). MethodsLinked healthcare records were used for a combined cohort of 11,323 adults from the 2013 and 2014 sweeps of the Welsh Health Survey (WHS). The approach utilised consented survey data linked to primary and secondary care electronic health record (EHR) data back to 2002 within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. ResultsThis descriptive study demonstrates validation of survey and clinical data using data linkage for selected chronic cardiovascular conditions and asthma with varied success. The results indicate that identifying cases for separate cardiovascular conditions was limited without specific medication codes for each condition, but more straightforward for asthma, where there was an extensive list of medications available. For asthma there was better agreement between prevalence estimates based on survey and clinical data as a result. ConclusionWhilst the results provide external validity for the WHS as an instrument for estimating the burden of chronic disease, they also indicate that a data linkage appproach can be used to produce comparable prevalence estimates using clinical data if a defined condition-specific set of clinical codes are available.


1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Catania ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-29
Author(s):  
Stella Babalola ◽  
Joshua O. Akinyemi ◽  
Clifford O. Odimegwu

Abstract Nigeria has one of the highest fertility rates in Africa. Data from 2013 Demographic and Health Surveys indicate a virtual stagnation of fertility rate since 2003. Low contraceptive use and pronatalist attitudes are among the factors contributing to the high fertility rate in Nigeria. In this manuscript, we pooled data from three most recent waves of Demographic and Health Surveys to examine trends in demand for children over time and identify the factors associated with change in demand for children. The data show that demand for children has declined since 2003 although not monotonically so. Variables that were positively associated with increased likelihood of desiring no additional children were residence in the South-West (as opposed to residence in the North-Central), exposure to family planning (FP) messages on the mass media, number of children ever born, educational level, and urban residence. In contrast, uncertainty about fertility desire was more widespread in 2008 compared to 2013 although less widespread in 2003 than in 2013. The likelihood of being undecided about fertility desire was positively associated with discrepancies in family size desires between husband and wife, parity and Islamic religious affiliation. Programs should aim to increase access to effective contraceptive methods and promote demand for contraceptives as a way of fostering a sustainable reduction in demand for children. Furthermore, strategies that address uncertainty by fostering women’s understanding of the social and health implications of large family sizes are relevant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document