scholarly journals Spatio-Temporal Elements of Articulation Work in the Achievement of Repeat Prescribing Safety in UK General Practice

Author(s):  
Suzanne Grant ◽  
Jessica Mesman ◽  
Bruce Guthrie
BMJ ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 291 (6493) ◽  
pp. 456-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
M O Roland ◽  
L I Zander ◽  
M Evans ◽  
R Morris ◽  
R A Savage

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Steven Lillis ◽  
Liza Lack

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONRepeat prescribing is common in New Zealand general practice. Research also suggests that repeat prescribing is a process prone to error. All New Zealand general practices have to comply with requirements to have a repeat prescribing policy, with the details of the policy to be designed by the practice. AIMTo inform the development of practice policy, research was undertaken with experienced general practitioners to identify and mitigate risk in the process. METHODSAt the 2019 annual conference of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, a workshop was held with 58 experienced general practitioner participants. The group was divided into six small groups, each with the task of discussing one aspect of the repeat prescribing process. The results were then discussed with the whole group and key discussion points were transcribed and analysed. RESULTSIssues identified included: improving patient education on appropriateness of repeat prescribing; having protected time for medicine reconciliation and the task of repeat prescribing; reducing the number of personnel and steps in the process; and clarity over responsibility for repeat prescribing. DISCUSSIONThis research can inform the local development of a repeat prescribing policy at the practice level or be used to critique existing practice policies. Attention was also drawn to the increasing administrative burden that repeat prescribing contributes to in general practice.


BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 343 (nov03 2) ◽  
pp. d6788-d6788 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Swinglehurst ◽  
T. Greenhalgh ◽  
J. Russell ◽  
M. Myall

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Savickas ◽  
E Foreman ◽  
M Iqbal ◽  
A Ladva ◽  
S K Bhamra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Clinical Pharmacists in General Practice (CPGP) initiative aims to recruit over 2000 clinical pharmacists in general practice (GP) surgeries in England by 2020. This study aimed to explore the services delivered by all GP pharmacy professionals (GPPPs; pharmacists/pharmacy technicians) across the UK. Methods 30-item e-questionnaire was developed using SurveyMonkey platform and piloted during one-to-one cognitive interviews with GPPPs. The survey was distributed via the Primary Care Pharmacy Association, social media sites, collaborating GP organisations and via emails to participants of CPGP pilot. Three reminders were sent out 1 week apart. University ethics approval was obtained. Results Ninety-one responses were received between November 2018 and March 2019 (89% pharmacists, 52% from CPGP pilot). Participants provided an average of 9 services (95% CI 8.3-9.9). Over 90% of pharmacists delivered medication reviews and over 80% managed patients with polypharmacy. More pharmacists within than outside of the CPGP pilot managed repeat prescribing requests (70% vs. 47%, p = 0.035). Technicians took responsibility for primarily non-clinical services such as service commissioning (90%), management of safety alerts/drug recalls (80%), standard operating procedures (80%) and education & training (80%). Over 40% of GPPPs not providing care home services wished to do so by 2024. Four technicians wanted to be more involved in medication reviews. The main perceived benefits of GP pharmacy services included identifying medicines-related issues (93%), utilisation of pharmacy professionals’ skills (93%) and a reduction in medication waste (92%). Conclusions GPPPs provide a range of clinical and non-clinical services which may benefit public health at an individual and healthcare system levels. Pharmacists within the pilot are more likely to deliver repeat prescribing services. Future GP pharmacy landscape will likely include additional services to care homes. Key messages GPPPs including pharmacy technicians provide clinical and non-clinical services, appropriate to their scope of practice, to benefit patients, healthcare systems and themselves. Developing future GP pharmacy services to care homes offers further opportunities to benefit a vulnerable group of patients with long-term illnesses.


1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. GOUDIE ◽  
P. E. McKENZIE ◽  
J. CIPRIANO ◽  
E. M. GRIFFIN ◽  
F. E. MURRAY

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. McKinnon ◽  
J. Townsend ◽  
J. Cooper ◽  
B. Hunt ◽  
J. Patel

Author(s):  
Chantal Simon ◽  
Hazel Everitt ◽  
Françoise van Dorp ◽  
Nazia Hussain ◽  
Emma Nash ◽  
...  

This chapter in the Oxford Handbook of General Practice explores all aspects of prescribing in general practice. It reviews NHS prescriptions and how to write prescriptions, including prescriptions for special groups, repeat prescribing, and management of medicines. It also discusses adverse drug reactions, licensing of medicines, how to handle controlled drugs, and non-drug interventions and complementary medicine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Steven Lillis ◽  
Nicki Macklin ◽  
Michael Thorn ◽  
Emma Wicks ◽  
Kristin Good ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONRepeat prescribing is an accepted part of general practice activities in New Zealand and in many developed countries. However, there has been little research on how this service is used in New Zealand, or on clinicians’ attitudes towards it. AIMTo discover the opinions of vocationally registered general practitioners (GPs) and general practice registrars regarding repeat prescribing, availability of practice policy and mechanisms for issuing such prescriptions. METHODSA survey was developed by an expert group and shared through the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners’ (the College) weekly newsletter, epulse, inviting members to participate in the survey. The survey was also emailed to registrars. RESULTSIn total, 144 vocationally registered GPs and 115 registrars responded (n=259), giving a response rate of 3.2% for GPs and 12.7% for registrars. Patient convenience and time efficiency for the practice were the most commonly cited reasons for repeat prescribing. Registrars had low awareness of practice policy on repeat prescribing and only one-quarter of practices had an orientation pack that contained advice on repeat prescribing. DISCUSSIONBetter practice systems are likely to improve the safety profile of repeat prescribing and should be addressed. There is substantial unwanted variability currently in these practice systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document