Contagious Equine Metritis Testing

2021 ◽  
pp. 195-198
Author(s):  
John J. Dascanio
1982 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoya KIKUCHI ◽  
Nobuo TSUNODA ◽  
Yoshimi KAWAKAMI ◽  
Nobuo MURASE ◽  
Keiichiro KAWATA

1985 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Hitchcock ◽  
T M Brown ◽  
D Corwin ◽  
S F Hayes ◽  
A Olszewski ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanobu KAMADA ◽  
Yutaka AKIYAMA ◽  
Takanori ODA ◽  
Yoshikazu FUKUZAWA

1982 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Corbel ◽  
R. A. Brewer

SummaryImmunoelectrophoresis of ultrasonically disrupted Haemophilus equigenitalis (contagious equine metritis organism) cells against rabbit and equine antisera disclosed at least 11 precipitating antigens. Two of these, a polysaccharide and a lipopolysaccharide–protein complex, were of high molecular weight and located on the cell surface. The remaining antigens were intracellular and were small- to medium-sized proteins.The surface antigens were the most significant in relation to the serological response in infected horses. They also reacted with sera from apparently healthy cattle, but the reason for this was not determined. No serological cross-reaction between H. equigenitalis and species of Achromobacter and Moraxella was detected.


2013 ◽  
Vol 167 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 2-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lance Schulman ◽  
Catherine Edith May ◽  
Bronwyn Keys ◽  
Alan John Guthrie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document