scholarly journals An updated infra‐familial classification of Sapindaceae based on targeted enrichment data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Buerki ◽  
Martin W. Callmander ◽  
Pedro Acevedo‐Rodriguez ◽  
Porter P. Lowry ◽  
Jérôme Munzinger ◽  
...  
Zootaxa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4834 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-501
Author(s):  
DOMINIQUE PLUOT-SIGWALT ◽  
PIERRE MOULET

The morphology of the spermatheca is described in 109 species of 86 genera representing all four currently recognised subfamilies of Coreidae, covering the undivided Hydarinae, both tribes of Pseudophloeinae, all three tribes of Meropachyinae and 27 of the 32 tribes of Coreinae. Three types of spermatheca are recognised. Type I is bipartite, consisting only of a simple tube differentiated into distal seminal receptacle and proximal spermathecal duct and lacks the intermediate part present in most Pentatomomorpha, in which it serves as muscular pump. Type II is also bipartite but more elaborate in form with the receptacle generally distinctly wider than the duct. Type III is tripartite, with receptacle, duct and an often complex intermediate part. Four subtypes are recognised within type III. Type I is found only in Hydarinae and type II only in Pseudophloeinae. Type III is found in both Coreinae and Meropachyinae. Subtype IIIA (“Coreus-group”) unites many tribes from the Eastern Hemisphere and only one (Spartocerini) from the Western Hemisphere. Subtypes IIIB (“Nematopus-group”) and IIID (“Anisoscelis-group”) are confined to taxa from the Western Hemisphere and subtype IIIC (“Chariesterus-group”) is found in tribes from both hemispheres. The polarity of several characters of the intermediate part and some of the spermathecal duct is evaluated, suggesting autapomorphies or apomorphies potentially relevant to the classification of Coreidae at the sufamilial and tribal levels. Characters of the intermediate part strongly indicate that the separation of Meropachyinae and Coreinae as currently constituted cannot be substantiated. The tribes Anisoscelini, Colpurini, Daladerini and Hyselonotini are heterogeneous, each exhibiting two subtypes of spermatheca, and probably polyphyletic. Two tribes, Cloresmini and Colpurini, requiring further investigation remain unplaced. This study demonstrates the great importance of characters of the spermatheca, in particular its intermediate part, for research into the phylogeny and taxonomy of Pentatomomorpha. 


Taxon ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Buck ◽  
Dale H. Vitt

1983 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan E. Fleming ◽  
Irl Extein ◽  
Harvey A. Sternbach ◽  
A.L.C. Pottash ◽  
Mark S. Gold

Zootaxa ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2741 (1) ◽  
pp. 66 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTHONY C. GILL ◽  
DOUGLAS F. HOESE

The familial classification of gobioid fishes is in a state of flux, reflecting incomplete understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the suborder. However, there has been rapid progress over the past decade or so, which is likely to continue, undoubtedly leading to the erection of new family-group names. One such family, Odontobutidae, was erected by Hoese and Gill (1993) for several Asiatic freshwater genera. Recently, the spelling of this taxon has been challenged (Kottelat, 2001; Chen et al., 2002). According to Chen et al. (2002: 233): “Although commonly spelled Odontobutidae, a family-group name based on the genus group name Odontobutis should be spelled Odontobutididae as the stem of the genus group name is odontobutid- (ICZN art. 29). The spelling Odontobutidae can be retained under ICZN art. 29.3.1.1 only if it is the “prevailing usage”, but ICZN is logically flawed on this point as it does not provide a tool to objectively decide what is the “prevailing usage”. Both spellings are in use, and it seems thus logical to stick to the letter of the ICZN.”


Taxon ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Luebert ◽  
Lorenzo Cecchi ◽  
Michael W. Frohlich ◽  
Marc Gottschling ◽  
C. Matt Guilliams ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Shipunov ◽  
Hye Ji Lee ◽  
Jinhee Choi ◽  
Kyle Pay ◽  
Sarah DeSpiegelaire ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Buxaceae constitute a morphologically diverse phylogenetic lineage of six genera, which includes about 140 species. The most well-known genera are Buxus, Sarcococca, and Pachysandra. Few species of woody Styloceras grow on mid-elevations in the Andes mountains region. Didymeles, with three species endemic to Madagascar, and the monotypic Haptanthus from Honduras, are the most unusual members of the group. The infra-familial classification of Buxaceae is controversial, and molecular data about many species, especially Old World, is still lacking. We used broad taxonomic sampling and molecular data from four chloroplast markers, and the nuclear ribosomal ITS to estimate their phylogeny. These data provide phylogenetic placements of 50 species and enabled better estimates of boundaries in Buxaceae. We described two subfamilies, two monotypic genera, two Buxus subgenera, and one new species of Didymeles from Madagascar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document