The effect of response interruption and redirection with and without a differential reinforcement of alternative behavior component on stereotypy and appropriate responses

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catia Cividini-Motta ◽  
Anna R. Garcia ◽  
Cynthia Livingston ◽  
Hannah L. MacNaul
Keyword(s):  
Differential Reinforcement ◽  
Alternative Behavior ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Response Interruption

THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE INTERRUPTION AND REDIRECTION (RIRD) AND DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT ON VOCAL STEREOTYPY AND APPROPRIATE VOCALIZATIONS

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Dickman ◽  
Candice N. Bright ◽  
Dawn H. Montgomery ◽  
Caio F. Miguel
Keyword(s):  
Differential Reinforcement ◽  
Vocal Stereotypy ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Response Interruption

Response Interruption and Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior for the Treatment of Pica

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis P. Hagopian ◽  
Melissa L. González ◽  
Tessa Taylor Rivet ◽  
Mandy Triggs ◽  
Seth B. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Differential Reinforcement ◽  
Alternative Behavior ◽  
Response Interruption

Evaluation of response interruption and redirection during school and community activities.

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly N. Sloman ◽  
Rebecca K. Schulman ◽  
Mariana Torres-Viso ◽  
Matthew L. Edelstein
Keyword(s):  
Community Activities ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
School And Community ◽  
Response Interruption

Generalization of response interruption and redirection procedure with vocal stereotypy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Barszcz ◽  
Annette K. Griffith ◽  
Patricia Weigand ◽  
Yors Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Vocal Stereotypy ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Response Interruption

scholarly journals FURTHER EVALUATION OF RESPONSE INTERRUPTION AND REDIRECTION AS TREATMENT FOR STEREOTYPY

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin N. Ahrens ◽  
Dorothea C. Lerman ◽  
Tiffany Kodak ◽  
April S. Worsdell ◽  
Courtney Keegan
Keyword(s):  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Response Interruption

Resurgence following traditional and interdependent differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-42
Author(s):  
Ashley M. Fuhrman ◽  
Wayne W. Fisher ◽  
Brian D. Greer ◽  
Timothy A. Shahan ◽  
Andrew R. Craig
Keyword(s):  
Differential Reinforcement ◽  
Alternative Behavior

Evaluation of publication bias in response interruption and redirection: A meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 2151-2171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Art Dowdy ◽  
Matt Tincani ◽  
W. Joel Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Response Interruption

Further evaluation of treatments for vocal stereotypy: Response interruption and redirection and response cost

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiersty McNamara ◽  
Catia Cividini‐Motta
Keyword(s):  
Response Cost ◽  
Vocal Stereotypy ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Response Interruption

Reducing Public Masturbation in Individuals With ASD: An Assessment of Response Interruption Procedures

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catia Cividini-Motta ◽  
Keira Moore ◽  
Lauren M. Fish ◽  
Jonathan C. Priehs ◽  
William H. Ahearn
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activities ◽  
Automatic Reinforcement ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Response Interruption And Redirection ◽  
Evaluation Phase ◽  
Adolescents With Autism ◽  
Neutral Tone ◽  
Response Interruption ◽  
Verbal Prompts

Individuals with autism may engage in sexual behavior at inappropriate times and/or in inappropriate places. The current study investigated the effects of response interruption and redirection (RIRD) and response interruption (RI) on public masturbation (PM) of children and adolescents with autism. Initial assessments showed that PM was maintained by automatic reinforcement. During the treatment evaluation phase, we compared RIRD and RI to determine whether either procedure was successful in decreasing the duration of PM. In the RIRD condition, contingent on the occurrence of any PM the participant completed physical activities involving both hands (e.g., moving chairs, touching toes). In the RI condition, the therapist interrupted all instances of PM using physical and verbal prompts (e.g., saying in a neutral tone, “Stop that” and moving hands away from genitals). Both procedures were effective in decreasing the duration of PM but RI required fewer resources and less time. Clinical implications and suggestions for future research are reviewed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document