Effects of outcome performance feedback on maintenance of client and staff behavior in a residential setting

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucius Arco
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Residential Setting ◽  
Staff Behavior ◽  
Outcome Performance

Performance feedback and maintenance of staff behavior residential settings

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-217
Author(s):  
Lucius Arco ◽  
Jay S. Birnbrauer
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Residential Settings ◽  
Staff Behavior

Effects of Specified Performance Criterion and Performance Feedback on Staff Behavior

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 760-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha L. Hardesty ◽  
Louis P. Hagopian ◽  
Melissa M. McIvor ◽  
Leaora L. Wagner ◽  
Sigurdur O. Sigurdsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Performance Criterion ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Staff Behavior

I Like Myself, I Really Do (at Least Right Now)

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almut Rudolph ◽  
Michela Schröder-Abé ◽  
Astrid Schütz
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Social Feedback ◽  
Student Sample ◽  
Empirically Supported ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Induced Changes

Abstract. In five studies, we evaluated the psychometric properties of a revised German version of the State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES; Heatherton & Polivy, 1991 ). In Study 1, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis on the original scale revealed poor model fit and poor construct validity in a student sample that resembled those in the literature; thus, a revised 15-item version was developed (i.e., the SSES-R) and thoroughly validated. Study 2 showed a valid three-factor structure (Performance, Social, and Appearance) and good internal consistency of the SSES-R. Correlations between subscales of trait and state SE empirically supported the scale’s construct validity. Temporal stability and intrapersonal sensitivity of the scale to naturally occurring events were investigated in Study 3. Intrapersonal sensitivity of the scale to experimentally induced changes in state SE was uncovered in Study 4 via social feedback (acceptance vs. rejection) and performance feedback (positive vs. negative). In Study 5, the scale’s interpersonal sensitivity was confirmed by comparing depressed and healthy individuals. Finally, the usefulness of the SSES-R was demonstrated by assessing SE instability as calculated from repeated measures of state SE.

The Influence of Cognitive and Affective Reactions to Feedback on Subsequent Goals

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remus Ilies ◽  
Timothy A. Judge ◽  
David T. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Business School ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Equation Model ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Dispositional Measure ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Reactions To Feedback

This paper focuses on explaining how individuals set goals on multiple performance episodes, in the context of performance feedback comparing their performance on each episode with their respective goal. The proposed model was tested through a longitudinal study of 493 university students’ actual goals and performance on business school exams. Results of a structural equation model supported the proposed conceptual model in which self-efficacy and emotional reactions to feedback mediate the relationship between feedback and subsequent goals. In addition, as expected, participants’ standing on a dispositional measure of behavioral inhibition influenced the strength of their emotional reactions to negative feedback.

How Performance Feedback and Reflection Affect Transactive Memory

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick van der Kleij ◽  
Maarten Hoeppermans
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Transactive Memory
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document