Stakeholder pressure and greenhouses gas voluntary disclosures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyton Chithambo ◽  
Venancio Tauringana ◽  
Ishmael Tingbani ◽  
Laura Achiro
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosures ◽  
Stakeholder Pressure

Voluntary Disclosures and the Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachna Prakash ◽  
Ella Mae Matsumura ◽  
Sandra C. Vera-Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Emissions ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Voluntary Disclosures

Fairness is in the Eye of the Investor: CEO Pay Ratio Voluntary Disclosures and Investor Reactions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Sandvik ◽  
Lisa LaViers ◽  
Da Xu
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosures ◽  
Ceo Pay

Market Reactions to Transparency International Reports on Corporate Anti-Corruption

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Blanc ◽  
Dennis M. Patten ◽  
Manuel Castelo Branco
Keyword(s):  
Market Reaction ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Corporate Reporting ◽  
Environmental Domain ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Stakeholder Pressure ◽  
Political Cost ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Environmental Events

ABSTRACT In this paper, we examine the investor response to the issuance of Transparency International's (TI) 2012 and 2014 Transparency in Corporate Reporting: Assessing the World's Largest Companies reports. Building on prior studies of political cost-inducing events in the environmental domain, we anticipate a negative market reaction, although we argue that the adjustment will be less severe for firms rated as having better anti-corruption disclosure. Focusing on a sample of U.S. companies to control for country-level effects and to allow for comparison with the prior environmental-themed studies, we document a significantly negative market reaction to the first TI report issuance. Although also negative, the market reaction to the 2014 report was not statistically significant. However, we also document that, as expected, market adjustments differ significantly across subgroups based on anti-corruption disclosure in both time periods. These results hold controlling for other factors potentially influencing investor perceptions of exposure to the report issuances. In general, our results are consistent with the prior studies and indicate that the market is savvy to political cost exposures arising from non-environmental events. The findings also suggest that TI's efforts may be increasing stakeholder pressure for corporate anti-corruption performance, but we caution that further investigation of the relation between disclosure and underlying performance in the corruption domain is warranted.

scholarly journals Does Stakeholder Pressure Matters in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Initiatives? Insights from Agro-Based Processing Industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 7278
Author(s):  
Tamoor Azam ◽  
Songjiang Wang ◽  
Muhammad Mohsin ◽  
Muhammad Nazam ◽  
Muhammad Hashim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Food Processing ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Sustainable Supply Chain ◽  
Sustainable Business ◽  
Global Marketplace ◽  
Sustainable Food ◽  
Business Goals ◽  
Stakeholder Pressure

Over the past few years, sustainable supply chain initiatives (SSCIs) have grabbed attention in the domestic, as well as global, marketplace of the food sector. Nowadays, the success of the entire food supply chain depends on the prosperity of farms, local communities, trader processors, and agro-based industries. Despite its importance, food processing industries (FPIs) are encountering various hurdles in achieving sustainable business goals due to the sheer number of potential barriers. Due to this reason, stakeholders are continuously pressuring the management of FPIs to embrace sustainable food processing activities. In light of this, the present study aims to apply a hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (F-AHP) framework, based on fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (F-TOPSIS), for analyzing the barriers and prioritizing the possible pathways in adopting the SSCIs for the development of FPIs. Based on the extensive review of literature and panel consultation with experienced experts, a total of seven main barriers, forty-two sub barriers, and five possible pathways as strategic tools were finalized and ranked. An empirical case investigation of a Pakistani-based food processing company has been taken to check the practical application of the proposed framework along with sensitivity analysis. The findings of this study reveal that the lack of sustainable outsourcing factors were found as the top-ranked barrier in implementing SSCIs, and the possible pathway to overcome this barrier is the appropriate management of the procurement cycle. The major contribution of this study is to establish a barriers prioritization framework and suggest possible pathways to overcome these barriers for the successful implementation of SSCIs. Finally, the theoretical, managerial, and policy implications are provided as a way forward for the concerned stakeholders and policymakers.

Corporate climate‐related voluntary disclosures: Does potential greenwash exist among Australian high emitters reports?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Kusumaning Wedari ◽  
Christine Jubb ◽  
Amir Moradi‐Motlagh
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosures

Does Audit Committee Disclosure of Partner-Selection Involvement Signal Greater Audit Quality?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy F. Downes ◽  
Michelle A. Draeger ◽  
Abbie E. Sadler
Keyword(s):  
Audit Committee ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Partner Selection ◽  
Analyst Forecasts ◽  
Securities And Exchange Commission ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Voluntary Disclosures ◽  
Level Of Involvement ◽  
Selection Of

We investigate whether audit committees use voluntary disclosures to signal the committees’ higher level of involvement in the audit partner-selection process, which contributes to higher levels of audit quality. Audit committees more involved in the partner-selection process should ensure the selection of a more rigorous partner. We test this conjecture by first identifying partners new to audit engagements. We then compare audit quality for companies whose audit committees disclose involvement in the selection of the new partner to those without this disclosure. We find that this disclosure is positively associated with audit quality (measured using discretionary accruals, misstatements, and meeting consensus analyst forecasts by a very small margin). Our results are more salient for complex companies and those with powerful audit committees. These findings highlight that audit committees use their disclosures to signal involvement in the partner-selection process and are relevant to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Voluntary disclosures by family French firms

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Meriem Jouirou
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document