Did appellate court find disciplinary process flawed?

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Eric Lyerly
Keyword(s):  
Appellate Court ◽  
Disciplinary Process

Did appellate court find disciplinary process flawed?

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Eric Lyerly
Keyword(s):  
Appellate Court ◽  
Disciplinary Process

Medicaid & Medicare: D.C. Appellate Court Denies Claim for Medicare Reimbursement of GME Cost

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-205
Author(s):  
choeffel Amy
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Federal Court ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
District Court ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
Court Of Appeals ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Summary Judgment

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld, in Presbyterian Medical Center of the University of Pennsylvania Health System v. Shalala, 170 F.3d 1146 (D.C. Cir. 1999), a federal district court ruling granting summary judgment to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in a case in which Presbyterian Medical Center (PMC) challenged Medicare's requirement of contemporaneous documentation of $828,000 in graduate medical education (GME) expenses prior to increasing reimbursement amounts. DHHS Secretary Donna Shalala denied PMC's request for reimbursement for increased GME costs. The appellants then brought suit in federal court challenging the legality of an interpretative rule that requires requested increases in reimbursement to be supported by contemporaneous documentation. PMC also alleged that an error was made in the administrative proceedings to prejudice its claims because Aetna, the hospital's fiscal intermediary, failed to provide the hospital with a written report explaining why it was denied the GME reimbursement.

Local Agency Bias in California Appellate Court Opinions on the California Environmental Quality Act

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean B. Hecht ◽  
Ethan N. Elkind ◽  
Michael Rhead Enion
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Quality ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
Local Agency

Patient Confidentiality: Hospital’s Release of Alcohol Treatment Data Does Not Violate Regs

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-321
Author(s):  
Hassen A. Sayeed
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Health Care Facility ◽  
Medical Practitioner ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
Treatment Data ◽  
Alcohol And Drug Abuse ◽  
Abuse Treatment

In M.A.K. v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court and held that the phrase any physician, medical practitioner, hospital, clinic, health care facility or other medical or medically related facility, in a patient's signed consent form met the general designation requirement of the Code of Federal Regulations for the release of alcohol and drug abuse treatment records. Thus, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the medical center's release of a patient's records did not violate the federal Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records regulations.

Paying the Price for a Seat on the Bench: Campaign Spending in Contested State Intermediate Appellate Court Elections

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Frederick ◽  
Matthew J. Streb
Keyword(s):  
Campaign Spending ◽  
Appellate Court

The Implications of ADA Litigation for Employers: A Review of Federal Appellate Court Decisions

2001 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Appellate Court ◽  
Court Decisions

Developing an alternative disciplinary process for the troubled nurse

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Jean Baldwin ◽  
Nancy B. Ramos ◽  
L Eugene Baldwin
Keyword(s):  
Disciplinary Process
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document