Diagnostic performances of the Afirma gene sequencing classifier in comparison with the gene expression classifier: A meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huy Gia Vuong ◽  
Truong Phan Xuan Nguyen ◽  
Lewis A. Hassell ◽  
Chan Kwon Jung
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 309-310
Author(s):  
Mayumi Endo ◽  
Fadi Nabhan ◽  
Laura Ryan ◽  
Shumei Meng ◽  
John Phay ◽  
...  

Thyroid ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1115-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Endo ◽  
Fadi Nabhan ◽  
Kyle Porter ◽  
Katie Roll ◽  
Lawrence A. Shirley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Bihui Pan ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Da Fang ◽  
Xianghua Ma ◽  
...  

Background. Approximately 15 to 30% of thyroid nodules evaluated by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were classified as indeterminate; the accurate diagnostic molecular tests of these nodules remain a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) for the indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). Methods. Studies published from January 2005 to December 2018 were systematically reviewed. The gold reference standard relied on the histopathologic results diagnosis from thyroidectomy surgical specimens. MetaDisc software was used to investigate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. Results. A total of 18 studies involving 5290 patients with 3290 cases of ITNs were included. Collected data revealed that the pooled sensitivity of GEC was 95.5% (95% CI 93.3%–97.0%, p < 0.001), the specificity was 22.1% (95% CI 19.4%-24.9%, p < 0.001), the NPV was 88.2% (95% CI 0.833–0.921, p < 0.001), the PPV was 44.3% (95% CI 0.416–0.471, p < 0.001), and the DOR was 5.25 (95% CI 3.42–8.04, p= 0.855). Conclusion. The GEC has quite high sensitivity of 95.5% but low specificity of 22.1%. The high sensitivity makes it probable to rule out malignant nodules. Thus, over half of nodules with GEC-suspicious results still require further validation like molecular markers, diagnostic surgery, or long follow-up, which limits its use in future clinical practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Santhanam ◽  
Rodhan Khthir ◽  
Todd Gress ◽  
Ayman Elkadry ◽  
Omolola Olajide ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyna Borowczyk ◽  
Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska ◽  
Michał Olejarz ◽  
Barbara Więckowska ◽  
Frederik A. Verburg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document