Risk‐Based Pharmacokinetic and Drug‐Drug Interaction Characterization of Antibody‐Drug Conjugates in Oncology Clinical Development: An IQ Consortium Perspective

Author(s):  
Chunze Li ◽  
Rajeev Menon ◽  
Markus Walles ◽  
Renu Singh ◽  
Vijay V. Upreti ◽  
...  
Bioanalysis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1115-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Lu ◽  
Srikumar Sahasranaman ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Sandhya Girish

2019 ◽  
Vol 411 (12) ◽  
pp. 2569-2576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malin Källsten ◽  
Matthijs Pijnappel ◽  
Rafael Hartmann ◽  
Fredrik Lehmann ◽  
Lucia Kovac ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Fonslow ◽  
Gabor Jarvas ◽  
Marton Szigeti ◽  
Andras Guttman

Aims: Demonstrating the capabilities of our new capillary electrophoresis – mass spectrometry method, which facilitates highly accurate relative quantitation of modification site occupancy of antibody-ligand (e.g., antibody-drug) conjugates. Background: Antibody-drug conjugates play important roles in medical discovery for imaging and therapeutic intervention. The localization and stoichiometry of the conjugation can affect the orientation, selectivity, specificity, and strength of molecular interactions, influencing biochemical function. Objective: To demonstrate the option to analyze the localization and stoichiometry of antibody-ligand conjugates by using essentially the same method at all levels including ligand infusion, peptide mapping, as well as reduced and intact protein analysis. Materials and Methods: Capillary electrophoresis coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was used to analyze the antibodyligand conjugates. Results: We identified three prevalent ligand conjugation sites with estimated stoichiometries of 73, 14, and 6% and an average ligand-antibody ratio of 1.37, illustrating the capabilities of CE-ESI-MS for rapid and efficient characterization of antibody-drug conjugates. Conclusion: The developed multilevel analytical method offers a comprehensive way to determine the localization and stoichiometry of antibody-drug conjugates for molecular medicinal applications. In addition, a significant advantage of the reported approach is that small, hydrophilic, unmodified peptides well separated from the neutrals, which is not common with other liquid phase separation methods such as LC.


Author(s):  
Frederik Marmé

Background Despite the advances that have been made to improve conventional chemotherapies, their use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window based on off-target toxicities. Antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) are composed of an antibody and a toxic payload covalently coupled by a chemical linker. They constitute an elegant means to tackle the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics by selectively delivering a highly toxic payload directly to target cells and thereby increasing efficacy of the delivered cytotoxic but at the same time limiting systemic exposure and toxicities. As such they appear inspired by Paul Ehrlich´s concept of a “magic bullet”, which he envisioned as drugs that go directly to their target to attack pathogens but remain harmless in healthy tissues. Summary The concept of conjugating drugs to antibodies via chemical linkers is not new. As early as in the 1960s researchers started to investigate such ADCs in animal models and first clinical trials based on mouse antibodies began in the 1980s. Although the concept appears relatively straightforward, ADCs are highly complex molecules, and it took several decades of research and development until the first ADC became approved by the FDA in 2000 and the second followed not until 11 years later. The development of an effective ADC is highly demanding, and each individual component of an ADC must be optimized: the target, the antibody, the linker and its conjugation chemistry as well as the cytotoxic payload. Today there are 9 approved ADCs overall and 3 for breast cancer. So, the pace of development seems to pick up with over 100 candidates in various stages of clinical development. Many ADCs of the newest generation are optimized to elicit a so-called bystander effect, to increase efficacy and tackle heterogneous antigen expression. This approach requires a balancing of efficacy and systemic toxicity. Hence, ADCs based on their complex biology cause relevant toxicities, which are characteristic for each specific compound and may include hematologic toxicities, elevated transaminases, gastrointestinal events, pneumonitis but also ocular toxicities as well as others many physicians may initially not be very familiar with. Management of the side effects will be key to the successful clinical use of these potent drugs. Key Messages This review focusses on the clinical experience with ADCs approved in breast cancer as well as promising candidates in late-stage clinical development. We will discuss the mode of action, biology, and composition of ADCs and how each of these crucial components influences their properties and efficacy.


Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (20) ◽  
pp. 4764
Author(s):  
Umbreen Hafeez ◽  
Sagun Parakh ◽  
Hui K. Gan ◽  
Andrew M. Scott

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel drugs that exploit the specificity of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to reach target antigens expressed on cancer cells for the delivery of a potent cytotoxic payload. ADCs provide a unique opportunity to deliver drugs to tumor cells while minimizing toxicity to normal tissue, achieving wider therapeutic windows and enhanced pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. To date, nine ADCs have been approved by the FDA and more than 80 ADCs are under clinical development worldwide. In this paper, we provide an overview of the biology and chemistry of each component of ADC design. We briefly discuss the clinical experience with approved ADCs and the various pathways involved in ADC resistance. We conclude with perspectives about the future development of the next generations of ADCs, including the role of molecular imaging in drug development.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Beck ◽  
Guillaume Terral ◽  
François Debaene ◽  
Elsa Wagner-Rousset ◽  
Julien Marcoux ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kraynov ◽  
A. V. Kamath ◽  
M. Walles ◽  
E. Tarcsa ◽  
A. Deslandes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document