Defining Inclusive mediation: Theory, practice, and research

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-324
Author(s):  
Caroline Harmon‐Darrow ◽  
Lorig Charkoudian ◽  
Tracee Ford ◽  
Michele Ennis ◽  
Erricka Bridgeford
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Schofield Clark

1986 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 683
Author(s):  
Deborah M. Kolb
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-74
Author(s):  
Paul M. Swiercz ◽  
Linda P. Flynn

Over the past decade there has been an upsurge of interest in the study of mediation. Much of the current interest is the consequence of mediation's apparent success in the management of labor‐management conflicts. It is suggested here that a critical examination of mandated mediation—a long standing, but neglected part of negotiation under the Railway Labor Act of 1926—can make substantive contributions to the development of mediation theory. This paper proposes a conceptual model for understanding context, process, and outcome constraints on the performance of mandated mediation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
N. Gertz ◽  
P. Verbeek ◽  
D.M. Douglas
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document