scholarly journals Landscape impacts of 3D‐seismic surveys in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha K. Raynolds ◽  
Janet C. Jorgenson ◽  
M. Torre Jorgenson ◽  
Mikhail Kanevskiy ◽  
Anna K. Liljedahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Arctic ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Seismic Surveys ◽  
Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Landscape Impacts

scholarly journals Comprehensive valuation of the ecosystem services of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Turner ◽  
Margaret A. Young ◽  
Maureen R. McClung ◽  
Matthew D. Moran
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Full Range ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Gas Drilling ◽  
Contingent Valuation Survey

AbstractEcosystem services (ES) have been well studied in most biomes, but the Arctic tundra has received little attention, despite covering over 10% of terrestrial Earth. Using established ES methodologies, we calculated values for the United States Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a region virtually undisturbed by humans, but slated for future oil and gas drilling. We estimated the Refuge is worth about 1,709 USD/hectare/year, equal to over 13 billion USD annually.Globally important services, such as climate regulation (e.g., carbon storage) and non-use services (e.g., aesthetic information), contributed the most value and were similar to valuations from more productive ecosystems. Local services made smaller contributions to the total, but they remain vitally important to local indigenous cultures. Strikingly, a contingent valuation survey of U.S. residents found that, after neutral educational information, willingness-to-pay to maintain the Refuge in its current state exceeded estimated values of the oil and gas deposits.Our study shows that citizens may value Arctic habitats beyond their traditional economic development potential. Our comprehensive ecosystem services valuation suggests that maintaining the Refuge in its current condition (i.e., de facto wilderness) with its full range of ES is more valuable to humanity compared to development for oil and gas.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Valuation of the Ecosystem Services of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Turner ◽  
Margaret A. Young ◽  
Matthew D. Moran ◽  
Maureen R. McClung
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Wildlife Refuge

scholarly journals Landsat-Assisted Environmental Mapping in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska,

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Walker ◽  
William Acevedo ◽  
K. R. Everett ◽  
Leonard Gaydos ◽  
Jerry Brown
Keyword(s):  
The Arctic ◽  
National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Environmental Mapping

scholarly journals Pictures of polar bears: Using visitor employed photography to identify experience indicators in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

2020 ◽  
Vol 269 ◽  
pp. 110779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica P. Fefer ◽  
Jeffrey C. Hallo ◽  
Robert G. Dvorak ◽  
Matthew T.J. Brownlee ◽  
Rachel H. Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Bears ◽  
National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Wildlife Refuge

Ignoring Indigenous peoples—climate change, oil development, and Indigenous rights clash in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

2019 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Zentner ◽  
Maik Kecinski ◽  
Angeline Letourneau ◽  
Debra Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Indigenous Rights ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Wildlife Refuge ◽  
Oil Development
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document