Review of odorants in human axillary odour and laundry malodour: The importance of branched C7 chain analogues in malodours perceived by humans

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Takeuchi ◽  
Masayuki Yabuki ◽  
Yoshihiro Hasegawa
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gordon James ◽  
Corrine J. Austin ◽  
Diana S. Cox ◽  
David Taylor ◽  
Ralph Calvert
Keyword(s):  

Perfumery ◽  
1988 ◽  
pp. 47-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Gower ◽  
A. Nixon ◽  
A. I. Mallet
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1800) ◽  
pp. 20190267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jitka Fialová ◽  
Vít Třebický ◽  
Radim Kuba ◽  
David Stella ◽  
Jakub Binter ◽  
...  

Dominance hierarchy is often established via repeated agonistic encounters where consistent winners are considered dominant. Human body odour contains cues to psychological dominance and competition, but it is not known whether competition outcome (a marker of a change in dominance hierarchy) affects the hedonic quality of human axillary odour. Therefore, we investigated the effect of winning and losing on odour quality. We collected odour samples from Mixed Martial Arts fighters approximately 1 h before and immediately after a match. Raters then assessed samples for pleasantness, attractiveness, masculinity and intensity. We also obtained data on donors' affective state and cortisol and testosterone levels, since these are known to be associated with competition and body odour quality. Perceived body odour pleasantness, attractiveness and intensity significantly decreased while masculinity increased after a match irrespective of the outcome. Nonetheless, losing a match affected the pleasantness of body odour more profoundly, though bordering formal level of significance. Moreover, a path analysis revealed that match loss led to a decrease in odour attractiveness, which was mediated by participants’ negative affective states. Our study suggests that physical competition and to some extent also its outcome affect the perceived quality of human body odour in specific real-life settings, thus providing cues to dominance-related characteristics. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Olfactory communication in humans’.


2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1800) ◽  
pp. 20190263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Radadiya ◽  
John A. Pickett

Interactions relating to human chemical signalling, although widely acknowledged, are relatively poorly characterized chemically, except for human axillary odour. However, the extensive chemical ecology of insects, involving countless pheromone and other semiochemical identifications, may offer insights into overcoming problems of characterizing human-derived semiochemicals more widely. Current techniques for acquiring insect semiochemicals are discussed, particularly in relation to the need for samples to relate, as closely as possible, to the ecological situation in which they are naturally deployed. Analysis is facilitated by chromatography coupled to electrophysiological preparations from the olfactory organs of insects in vivo . This is not feasible with human olfaction, but there are now potential approaches using molecular genetically reconstructed olfactory preparations already in use with insect systems. There are specific insights of value for characterizing human semiochemicals from advanced studies on semiochemicals of haematophagous insects, which include those involving human hosts, in addition to wider studies on farm and companion animals. The characterization of the precise molecular properties recognized in olfaction could lead to new advances in analogue design and a range of novel semiochemicals for human benefit. There are insights from successful synthetic biology studies on insect semiochemicals using novel biosynthetic precursors. Already, wider opportunities in olfaction emerging from in silico studies, involving a range of theoretical and computational approaches to molecular design and understanding olfactory systems at the molecular level, are showing promise for studying human semiochemistry. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘ Olfactory communication in humans ’.


2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Marin ◽  
G Rapisardi ◽  
F Tani

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (13) ◽  
pp. 331-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin J Penn ◽  
Elisabeth Oberzaucher ◽  
Karl Grammer ◽  
Gottfried Fischer ◽  
Helena A Soini ◽  
...  

Individuals are thought to have their own distinctive scent, analogous to a signature or fingerprint. To test this idea, we collected axillary sweat, urine and saliva from 197 adults from a village in the Austrian Alps, taking five sweat samples per subject over 10 weeks using a novel skin sampling device. We analysed samples using stir bar sorptive extraction in connection with thermal desorption gas chromatograph–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and then we statistically analysed the chromatographic profiles using pattern recognition techniques. We found more volatile compounds in axillary sweat than in urine or saliva, and among these we found 373 peaks that were consistent over time (detected in four out of five samples per individual). Among these candidate compounds, we found individually distinct and reproducible GC–MS fingerprints, a reproducible difference between the sexes, and we identified the chemical structures of 44 individual and 12 gender-specific volatile compounds. These individual compounds provide candidates for major histocompatibility complex and other genetically determined odours. This is the first study on human axillary odour to sample a large number of subjects, and our findings are relevant to understanding the chemical nature of human odour, and efforts to design electronic sensors (e-nose) for biometric fingerprinting and disease diagnoses.


1990 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 197-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J. RENNIE ◽  
D.B. GOWER ◽  
K.T. HOLLAND ◽  
A.I. MALLET ◽  
W.J. WATKINS
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document