Early diagnosis of dementia in primary care: a representative eight-year follow-up study in Lower Saxony, Germany

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lienhard Maeck ◽  
Sebastian Haak ◽  
Anita Knoblauch ◽  
Gabriela Stoppe
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lienhard Maeck ◽  
Sebastian Haak ◽  
Anita Knoblauch ◽  
Gabriela Stoppe

1994 ◽  
Vol 244 (5) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Stoppe ◽  
Hagen Sandholzer ◽  
Jürgen Staedt ◽  
Silke Winter ◽  
Jörg Kiefer ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary P Cosgrave ◽  
Janette Tyrrell ◽  
Mary McCarron ◽  
Michael Gill ◽  
Brian A Lawlor

AbstractObjectives: To investigate the development of dementia over a five year follow up period in a population of females with Down's syndrome; to examine age at onset and duration of dementia in the population; to document the clinical features of dementia and to highlight scores on functional and cognitive rating scales at diagnosis of dementia and at the onset of complete dependency.Method: A five year follow-up study of 80 female subjects on prevalence of dementia, early clinical features of dementia and patterns of scoring on rating scales at diagnosis and end-stage dementia was completed. Results: Over the five year study period the number of subjects diagnosed with dementia rose from seven (8.75%) to 35 (43.75%). Age related prevalence figures showed that dementia was more common with increasing age. The earliest recognisable symptoms of dementia were memory loss, spatial disorientation and loss of independence especially in the area of personal hygiene. These findings were confirmed by the rating scales used in the study.Conclusions: The earliest recognisable clinical features of dementia include memory loss and increased dependency. The results of this study should facilitate earlier diagnosis of dementia in DS.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Guarnaccia ◽  
Andrea Lombardi ◽  
Alessandro Gaffurini ◽  
Mariateresa Chiarini ◽  
Serena Domenighini ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisbeth Frostholm ◽  
Eva Ørnbøl ◽  
Henriette Schou Hansen ◽  
Frede Olesen ◽  
John Weinman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tuomo Lehtovuori ◽  
Timo Kauppila ◽  
Jouko Kallio ◽  
Anna M. Heikkinen ◽  
Marko Raina ◽  
...  

Introduction. We studied whether primary care teams respond to financial group bonuses by improving the recording of diagnoses, whether this intervention leads to diagnoses reflecting the anticipated distribution of diseases, and how the recording of a significant chronic disease, diabetes, alters after the application of these bonuses. Methods. We performed an observational register-based retrospective quasi-experimental follow-up study with before-and-after setting and two control groups in primary healthcare of a Finnish town. We studied the rate of recorded diagnoses in visits to general practitioners with interrupted time series analysis. The distribution of these diagnoses was also recorded. Results. After group bonuses, the rate of recording diagnoses increased by 17.9% (95% CI: 13.6–22.3) but not in either of the controls (−2.0 to −0.3%). The increase in the rate of recorded diagnoses in the care teams varied between 14.9% (4.7–25.2) and 33.7% (26.6–41.3). The distribution of recorded diagnoses resembled the respective distribution of diagnoses in the former studies of diagnoses made in primary care. The rate of recorded diagnoses of diabetes did not increase just after the intervention. Conclusions. In primary care, the completeness of diagnosis recording can be, to varying degrees, influenced by group bonuses without guarantee that recording of clinically significant chronic diseases is improved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document