African American Students in Counselor Education Programs: Perceptions of Their Experiences

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malik S. Henfield ◽  
Delila Owens ◽  
Sheila Witherspoon
2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
Eleanor Craft ◽  
Aimee Howley

Background/Context Disproportionate placement of African American students into special education programs is likely to be a form of institutional racism, especially when such placement stigmatizes students. If placement also fails to lead to educational benefits, the practice becomes even more suspect. Some studies have explored disproportionate placement (i.e., over-representation) from the perspectives of policy makers and educators, but few have looked at the practice from the vantage of the African American students experiencing it. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study This study explored how nine African American students in secondary special education placements perceived their school experiences and the benefits, challenges, and detriments associated with their placements and accompanying disability labels. Setting Participating students attended one of three high schools in an urban district in the midwestern United States. Respectively, the schools had low, medium, and high percentages of students on individualized education programs (IEPs). Population/Participants/Subjects Three students from each of three schools participated in the study. With the help of school personnel, the researchers selected students who (a) were African American, (b) were juniors or seniors, (c) carried the label of learning disabilities or mild cognitive impairment, and (d) had received special education services for at least three years. Research Design The researchers used an in-depth interview design including three increasingly detailed interviews with each student. Verbatim transcripts of interviews provided the data the researchers analyzed using (a) inductive coding, (b) development of case-specific profiles, (c) organization of codes to identify patterns in the data, and (d) identification of emergent themes. Findings/Results Three emergent themes suggested that, in most cases, students found the negative consequences of their special education placement to outweigh any benefits. The limited benefits of placement included interactions with responsive teachers and, in a few cases, more suitable instructional pacing. The negative consequences included the experience of being stigmatized by peers, making limited academic progress because of a slow-paced curriculum, and confronting barriers that kept them from returning to general education placements. Conclusions/Recommendations The study found that traumatic events in the students’ lives led to academic difficulties, which subsequently led to placement in special education. Rather than supporting the students through a difficult phase of their lives, educators used special education referral and placement as a form of victim blaming. This response had the effect of excluding the students from engagement with the general education curriculum and from interaction with friends. The dynamics of victim blaming led the researchers to judge special education referral and placement of the nine African American students as a form of institutional racism.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Barfield ◽  
D. C. Cobler ◽  
Eddie T. C. Lam ◽  
James Zhang ◽  
George Chitiyo

Kinesiology departments have recently started to offer allied health education programs to attract additional students to teacher education units ( 9 ). Although allied health professions offer increased work opportunities, insufficient enrollment and training of minority students in these academic fields contribute to underrepresentation in the workforce ( 3 ). To improve workforce diversity, kinesiology departments must understand how enrollment influences and barriers differ by race among prospective students. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify differences in allied health education enrollment influences and enrollment barriers between minority and Caucasian students. Participants ( n = 601) consisted of students enrolled in kinesiology-based allied health education programs. Multivariate ANOVA was used to compare group differences in enrollment decision making. “Personal influence,” “career opportunity,” and “physical self-efficacy” were all significantly stronger enrollment influences among African-American students than among Caucasian students, and “social influence,” “experiential opportunity,” “academic preparation,” and “physical self-efficacy” were all perceived as significantly greater barriers compared with Caucasian students. Findings support the need to recruit African-American students through sport and physical education settings and to market program-based experiential opportunities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Douglas G Wren

Point of view:  I am a cisgender, White male in my sixties.  I retired recently after working with children in a professional capacity since the mid-1970s.  My first career involved organizing and managing youth sports programs for public recreation departments.  I began my second career as an elementary school teacher in the privileged white neighborhood where I grew up near Atlanta, Georgia.  There were no African American students at any of the public schools I attended.  By the time I took a position in the central office after teaching for 14 years, Black students comprised 77% of the county’s 98,000 students (Anderson & Smith-Hunt, 2005).  I spent my last six years in the classroom teaching fifth graders and serving as the school’s gifted liaison teacher.  In the latter role, I administered tests to students to determine if they were eligible for the “gifted” label.  At that time, I also taught an assessment course to teachers who were seeking a gifted add-on endorsement to their teaching certificates.  I recently retired from a large school district in a different state after working as an educational measurement and assessment specialist for 12 years.  Value:  Numerous educational policies and procedures in the United States benefit children from privileged families over their traditionally underserved counterparts, which include students of color and low-income students.  This piece describes a public school district’s inequitable practices related to its program for gifted students, practices that are not uncommon in many American school districts.  “Education is one of the best ways to address systemic inequities, but education systems in the US seem to be increasingly subject to criticism that they are unable to change and promote equity” (Cheville, 2018, p. 1).  Despite their inherent resistance to change, educational agencies must be made aware of discriminatory policies and procedures.  Stakeholders must then hold policy makers and educational leaders to account.  As James hanged until it is faced” (1962, p. 38). Summary:  Gifted education programs in public schools comprise mainly middle-class and upper-middle-class students of European and Asian descent.  Students from low socioeconomic groups, African American students, Latinx students, and Indigenous American students continue to be underrepresented in gifted programs, despite the fact that this inequity was brought to light many years ago (Ford, 1998).  Given our nation’s long history of overt and covert racism, it is not surprising that the manner by which students are identified for gifted services is systemically entrenched and at the heart of the problem.  Most states have mandates or provide guidance to local school districts regarding identification criteria; however, very few of the measurement instruments and methods used to evaluate of children for gifted services are effective at facilitating equal representation of all groups in gifted education programs.  This piece examines one school district’s guidelines used to identify students for gifted services, including admittance to its prestigious school for gifted children.  Because the guidelines are typical of practices employed by many other school districts, the information contained herein is generalizable to a larger audience. 


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guler Boyraz ◽  
Sharon G. Horne ◽  
Archandria C. Owens ◽  
Aisha P. Armstrong

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-93
Author(s):  
Celeste Hawkins

This article focuses on findings from a subgroup of African-American male students as part of a broader qualitative dissertation research study, which explored how exclusion and marginalization in schools impact the lives of African-American students. The study focused on the perspectives of youth attending both middle and high schools in Michigan, and investigated how students who have experienced forms of exclusion in their K–12 schooling viewed their educational experiences. Key themes that emerged from the study were lack of care, lack of belonging, disrupted education, debilitating discipline, and persistence and resilience. These themes were analyzed in relation to their intersectionality with culture, ethnicity, race, class, and gender.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document