scholarly journals Matching‐adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) as per label compared with modified VTd dosing schedules in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant eligible

eJHaem ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 481-488
Author(s):  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
María‐Victoria Mateos ◽  
Adrian Alegre ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
...  
Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-154
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Benjamin Hebraud ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
...  

Aim: To compare daratumumab plus standard-of-care (SoC; bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone [VTd]) and VTd alone with other SoC for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients & methods: We conducted an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison of progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) with D-VTd/VTd versus bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd), bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCd) and bortezomib/dexamethasone (Vd). Results: After matching adjustment, significant improvements in PFS were estimated for D-VTd versus VRd (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.33–0.69]), VCd (HR: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.21–0.58]) and Vd (HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.28–0.63]). OS was significantly longer with D-VTd versus VRd (HR: 0.31 [95% CI: 0.16–0.57]), VCd (HR: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.14–0.86]) and Vd (HR: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.18–0.77]). No significant PFS/OS differences were seen for VTd versus other SoC. Conclusion: This analysis supports front-line daratumumab for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 680-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Jesus San-Miguel ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 8295-8302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Mei Zhang ◽  
Xi-Yang Liu ◽  
Yu-Zhang Liu ◽  
Li-Na Liu ◽  
Quan-De Lin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Okazuka ◽  
Tadao Ishida ◽  
Junichiro Nashimoto ◽  
Yui Uto ◽  
Kota Sato ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghao Wu ◽  
Cuiping Zheng ◽  
Songyan Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Cai ◽  
Yuejian Shi ◽  
...  

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document