scholarly journals Two-week joint mobilization intervention improves self-reported function, range of motion, and dynamic balance in those with chronic ankle instability

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1798-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Hoch ◽  
Richard D. Andreatta ◽  
David R. Mullineaux ◽  
Robert A. English ◽  
Jennifer M. Medina McKeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
Joint Mobilization ◽  
Function Range

Erratum: Harkey et al (2014)

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 197
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
Correct Version ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Neural Excitability ◽  
Joint Mobilization ◽  
Star Excursion Balance Test

In Table 2 in the article by Harkey M, McLeod M, Van Scoit A, et al, “The Immediate Effects of an Anterior-to-Posterior Talar Mobilization on Neural Excitability, Dorsiflexion Range of Motion, and Dynamic Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability,” in J Sport Rehabil. 23(4):351–359, the composite and anterior scores for the Star Excursion Balance Test in the joint-mobilization group were transposed. Printed here is the correct version of the table.

Decreased dynamic balance and dorsiflexion range of motion in young and middle-aged adults with chronic ankle instability

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 976-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle B. Kosik ◽  
Nathan F. Johnson ◽  
Masafumi Terada ◽  
Abbey C. Thomas ◽  
Carl G. Mattacola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Middle Aged Adults

The Immediate Effects of an Anterior-To-Posterior Talar Mobilization on Neural Excitability, Dorsiflexion Range of Motion, and Dynamic Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Harkey ◽  
Michelle McLeod ◽  
Ashley Van Scoit ◽  
Masafumi Terada ◽  
Michael Tevald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Spinal Reflex ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Joint Mobilization ◽  
Grade Iii

Context:Altered neuromuscular function and decreased dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) have been observed in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Joint mobilizations are indicated for restoring DFROM and dynamic postural control, yet it remains unknown if a mobilization can alter neuromuscular excitability in muscles surrounding the ankle.Objective:To determine the immediate effects of a Maitland grade III anterior-to-posterior joint mobilization on spinal-reflex and corticospinal excitability in the fibularis longus (FL) and soleus (SOL), DFROM, and dynamic postural control.Design:Single-blinded randomized control trial.Setting:Research laboratory.Patients:30 patients with CAI randomized into a mobilization (n = 15) or control (n = 15) group.Intervention:Maitland grade III anterior-to-posterior joint mobilization.Main Outcome Measures:Spinal-reflex excitability was measured with the Hoffmann reflex, while corticospinal excitability was evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. DFROM was measured seated with the knee extended, and dynamic postural control was quantified with the Star Excursion Balance Test. Separate 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVAs were performed for each outcome measure. Dependent t tests were used to evaluate individual differences within groups in the presence of significance.Results:Spinal-reflex and corticospinal excitability of the SOL and FL were not altered in the mobilization or control group (P > .05). DFROM increased immediately after the mobilization (P = .05) but not in the control group, while dynamic postural control was unchanged in both groups (P > .05).Conclusion:A single joint-mobilization treatment was efficacious at restoring DFROM in participants with CAI; however, excitability of spinal reflex and corticospinal pathways at the ankle and dynamic postural control were unaffected.

scholarly journals Effects of midfoot joint mobilization on perceived ankle-foot function in chronic ankle instability. A crossover clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbis Jaffri ◽  
John J. Fraser ◽  
Rachel M. Koldenhoven ◽  
Jay Hertel
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
Pain Patient ◽  
Joint Mobility ◽  
Joint Mobilization ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
To Receive

AbstractBackgroundChronic ankle instability (CAI) is a complex clinical entity that commonly includes ankle-foot impairment.ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of midfoot joint mobilizations and a one-week home exercise program (HEP) compared to a sham intervention and HEP on pain, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ankle-foot joint mobility, and neuromotor function in young adults with CAI.MethodsTwenty participants with CAI were instructed in a stretching, strengthening, and balance HEP and were randomized a priori to receive midfoot joint mobilizations (forefoot supination, cuboid glide and plantar 1st tarsometatarsal) or a sham laying-of-hands. Changes in foot morphology, joint mobility, strength, dynamic balance, and PROs assessing pain, physical, and psychological function were assessed pre-to-post treatment and one-week following. Participants crossed-over to receive the alternate treatment and were assessed pre-to-post treatment and one-week following. Linear modelling was used to assess changes in outcomes.ResultsParticipants who received midfoot mobilization demonstrated significantly greater perceived improvement immediately posttreatment in the single assessment numeric evaluation (Sham: 5.0±10.2%; Mobilization: 43.9±26.2%; β: 6.8 p<0.001, Adj R2:0.17) and Global Rating of Change (Sham: −0.1±1.1; Mobilization: 1.1±3.0; β: 1.8 p=0.01, Adj R2:0.12). Following the mobilization intervention, participants demonstrated greater improved rearfoot inversion mobility (Sham: 4.4±8.4°; Mobilization: −1.6±6.1°; β: −6.37, p=0.01, Adj R2:0.19), plantarflexion mobility (Sham: 2.7°±6.4; Mobilization: −1.7°±4.3; β: −4.36, p=0.02, Adj R2:0.07), and posteromedial dynamic balance (Sham: 2.4±5.9%; Mobilization: 6.0±5.4%; β: 3.88, p=0.04, Adj R2:0.10) compared to controls at 1-week post-treatment.ConclusionParticipants with CAI who received midfoot joint mobilization had greater perceived improvement and physical signs that may benefit this clinical population.

Association between corticospinal inhibition and active dorsiflexion range of motion in patients with chronic ankle instability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle B. Kosik ◽  
Masafumi Terada ◽  
Ryan S. McCann ◽  
Colin P. Drinkard ◽  
Phillip A. Gribble
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability

The Effect of 2 Forms of Talocrural Joint Traction on Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Postural Control in Those With Chronic Ankle Instability

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron J. Powden ◽  
Kathleen K. Hogan ◽  
Erik A. Wikstrom ◽  
Matthew C. Hoch
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
Physical Contact ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Talocrural Joint ◽  
Sham Condition

Context:Talocrural joint mobilizations are commonly used to address deficits associated with chronic ankle instability (CAI).Objective:Examine the immediate effects of talocrural joint traction in those with CAI.Design:Blinded, crossover.Setting:Laboratory.Participants:Twenty adults (14 females; age = 23.80 ± 4.02 y; height = 169.55 ± 12.38 cm; weight = 78.34 ± 16.32 kg) with self-reported CAI participated. Inclusion criteria consisted of a history of ≥1 ankle sprain, ≥2 episodes of giving way in the previous 3 mo, answering “yes” to ≥4 questions on the Ankle Instability Instrument, and ≤24 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool.Intervention:Subjects participated in 3 sessions in which they received a single treatment session of sustained traction (ST), oscillatory traction (OT), or a sham condition in a randomized order. Interventions consisted of four 30-s sets of traction with 1 min of rest between sets. During ST and OT, the talus was distracted distally from the ankle mortise to the end-range of accessory motion. ST consisted of continuous distraction and OT involved 1-s oscillations between the mid and end-range of accessory motion. The sham condition consisted of physical contact without force application. Preintervention and postintervention measurements of weight-bearing dorsiflexion, dynamic balance, and static single-limb balance were collected.Main Outcome Measures:The independent variable was treatment (ST, OT, sham). The dependent variables included pre-to-posttreatment change scores for the WBLT (cm), normalized SEBTAR (%), and time-to-boundary (TTB) variables(s). Separate 1-way ANOVAs examined differences between treatments for each dependent variable. Alpha was set a priori at P < .05.Results:No significant treatment effects were identified for any variables.Conclusion:A single intervention of ST or OT did not produce significant changes in weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion or postural control in individuals with CAI. Future research should investigate the effects of repeated talocrural traction treatments and the effects of this technique when combined with other manual therapies.

Predicting dynamic balance improvements following 4-weeks of balance training in chronic ankle instability patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 538-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Burcal ◽  
Michelle A. Sandrey ◽  
Tricia Hubbard-Turner ◽  
Patrick O. McKeon ◽  
Erik A. Wikstrom
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Balance Training ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document