scholarly journals Surgical Implantation of Acoustic Tags in American Shad to Resolve Riverine and Marine Restoration Challenges

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 272-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin I. Gahagan ◽  
Michael M. Bailey
2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 1287-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven T. Kessel ◽  
Nigel E. Hussey

Tonic immobility is a widely used technique for the surgical implantation of acoustic tags in elasmobranchs (sharks, skates, and rays), yet it is still not broadly recognised as an acceptable procedure by many regulatory bodies, animal care committees, and even journal ethics standards. To highlight its regular use and applicability as a field procedure, a literature search was conducted on the anaesthetic technique adopted for all existing elasmobranch-focused acoustic telemetry papers, up to 31 December 2013. A total of 57 studies were identified that contained relevant details on surgical methodological procedures. Of these, the majority of studies (43, or 75.4%) employed tonic immobility, while 10 (17.6%) used general chemical anaesthetic and 4 (7%) used local chemical anaesthetic. These studies identify that tonic immobility provides an effective anaesthetic for surgical implantation in elasmobranchs, as it offers several benefits over chemical anaesthetics, both from a practical and from an animal welfare perspective. Practically, rapid induction and recovery optimizes the surgical procedure, desirable under often complex field conditions, where general chemical anaesthetics prolong duration and administration is often unfeasible because of the size of study animals. Benefits over chemical anaesthetic for animal welfare include no risk of overdose, no uptake of chemicals to body tissues, minimal disruption to respiration, thereby reducing potential for negative sublethal impacts that influence postrelease behaviour, and immediate and full recovery. Given these benefits and its long-standing use in field studies, it is recommended that tonic immobility be recognised as an acceptable anaesthetic technique for surgical procedures on elasmobranchs.


1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-88
Author(s):  
CHARLOTTE M PORTER

A curious error affects the names of three North American clupeids—the Alewife, American Shad, and Menhaden. The Alewife was first described by the British-born American architect, Benjamin Henry Latrobe in 1799, just two years after what is generally acknowledged as the earliest description of any ichthyological species published in the United States. Latrobe also described the ‘fish louse’, the common isopod parasite of the Alewife, with the new name, Oniscus praegustator. Expressing an enthusiasm for American independence typical of his generation, Latrobe humorously proposed the name Clupea tyrannus for the Alewife because the fish, like all tyrants, had parasites or hangers-on.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn N. Wagner ◽  
Steven J. Cooke ◽  
Richard S. Brown ◽  
Katherine A. Deters

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Grajales-Reyes ◽  
Bryan A. Copits ◽  
Ferrona Lie ◽  
Yongjoon Yu ◽  
Raudel Avila ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erin K. Gilligan‐Lunda ◽  
Daniel S. Stich ◽  
Katherine E. Mills ◽  
Michael M. Bailey ◽  
Joseph D. Zydlewski

2001 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
W. Barksdale Maynard ◽  
Richard Gerstell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document