scholarly journals High‐resolution microscopic diffusion anisotropy imaging in the human hippocampus at 3T

Author(s):  
Jiyoon Yoo ◽  
Leevi Kerkelä ◽  
Patrick W. Hales ◽  
Kiran K. Seunarine ◽  
Christopher A. Clark
NeuroImage ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansi B. Parekh ◽  
Brian K. Rutt ◽  
Ryan Purcell ◽  
Yuanxin Chen ◽  
Michael M. Zeineh

Neurology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (20) ◽  
pp. 1654-1654 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Schweitzer ◽  
P. Foroutan ◽  
D. W. Dickson ◽  
D. F. Broderick ◽  
U. Klose ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1266-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley P. Thomas ◽  
E. Brian Welch ◽  
Blake D. Niederhauser ◽  
William O. Whetsell ◽  
Adam W. Anderson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 670-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Dudukovic ◽  
Alison R. Preston ◽  
Jermaine J. Archie ◽  
Gary H. Glover ◽  
Anthony D. Wagner

A primary function of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) is to signal prior encounter with behaviorally relevant stimuli. MTL match enhancement—increased activation when viewing previously encountered stimuli—has been observed for goal-relevant stimuli in nonhuman primates during delayed-match-to-sample tasks and in humans during more complex relational memory tasks. Match enhancement may alternatively reflect (a) an attentional response to familiar relative to novel stimuli or (b) the retrieval of contextual details surrounding the past encounter with familiar stimuli. To gain leverage on the functional significance of match enhancement in the hippocampus, high-resolution fMRI of human MTL was conducted while participants attended, ignored, or passively viewed face and scene stimuli in the context of a modified delayed-match-to-sample task. On each “attended” trial, two goal-relevant stimuli were encountered before a probe that either matched or mismatched one of the attended stimuli, enabling examination of the consequences of encountering one of the goal-relevant stimuli as a match probe on later memory for the other (nonprobed) goal-relevant stimulus. fMRI revealed that the hippocampus was insensitive to the attentional manipulation, whereas parahippocampal cortex was modulated by scene-directed attention, and perirhinal cortex showed more subtle and general effects of attention. By contrast, all hippocampal subfields demonstrated match enhancement to the probe, and a postscan test revealed more accurate recognition memory for the nonprobed goal-relevant stimulus on match relative to mismatch trials. These data suggest that match enhancement in human hippocampus reflects retrieval of other goal-relevant contextual details surrounding a stimulus's prior encounter.


2001 ◽  
Vol 265 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Zeineh ◽  
Stephen A. Engel ◽  
Paul M. Thompson ◽  
Susan Y. Bookheimer

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S196
Author(s):  
AA Bazih ◽  
A Ekstrom ◽  
N Suthana ◽  
R Al-Hakim ◽  
K Ogura ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 479-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Treit ◽  
Trevor Steve ◽  
Donald W. Gross ◽  
Christian Beaulieu

Author(s):  
Daniel H. Adler ◽  
Alex Yang Liu ◽  
John Pluta ◽  
Salmon Kadivar ◽  
Sylvia Orozco ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. S386
Author(s):  
Fabio Babiloni ◽  
Filippo Carducci ◽  
Febo Cincotti ◽  
Paolo Maria Rossini ◽  
Claudio Babiloni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document