Utility of phrenic nerve conduction studies for identification of patients with neuromuscular diseases requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Narukawa ◽  
Keita Ishizuka ◽  
Kohei Sugimoto ◽  
Kyoichi Nomura
2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas E. Johnson ◽  
Michael Utz ◽  
Erica Patrick ◽  
Nicole Rheinwald ◽  
Marlene Downs ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Liberty Jenkins ◽  
Sarada Sakamuri ◽  
Jonathan S. Katz ◽  
Dallas A. Forshew ◽  
Lee Guion ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michale R. Swenson ◽  
Robert S. Rubenstein

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1546-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amer Alshekhlee ◽  
Raymond P. Onders ◽  
Tanvir U. Syed ◽  
Maryjo Elmo ◽  
Bashar Katirji

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rowaida Hamdy Ali ◽  
Mai Mohamed Farouk ◽  
Salwa Galal Moussa

Abstract Background Cervical spondylosis is a chronic degenerative condition of the cervical spine that can affect the cervical nerve roots. The origin of the phrenic nerve makes it vulnerable to injury. The purpose of this study is to investigate possible subtle phrenic nerve affection in patients with cervical spondylosis using nerve conduction studies (NCS). This study was conducted on 30 patients with cervical spondylosis above C5 and on 30 healthy volunteers. Nerve conduction studies of both phrenic nerves were performed in all cases. Results The patients with cervical spondylosis showed a statistically highly significant prolongation of phrenic nerve distal motor latency (DML) than the control group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference regarding amplitude (P > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between DML and X-ray score (r < 0.05). Conclusions Cervical spondylosis is an underestimated cause of phrenic nerve delayed DML. There is a correlation between the delay of phrenic nerve DML and the severity of cervical spondylosis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 869-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Analucia Abreu Maranhão ◽  
Sonia Regina da Silva Carvalho ◽  
Marcelo Ribeiro Caetano ◽  
Alexandre Hofke Alamy ◽  
Eduardo Mesquita Peixoto ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the present study was to define normative data of phrenic nerve conduction parameters of a healthy population. Methods: Phrenic nerve conduction studies were performed in 27 healthy volunteers. Results: The normative limits for expiratory phrenic nerve compound muscle action potential were: amplitude (0.47 mv - 0.83 mv), latency (5.74 ms - 7.10 ms), area (6.20 ms/mv - 7.20 ms/mv) and duration (18.30 ms - 20.96 ms). Inspiratory normative limits were: amplitude (0.67 mv - 1.11 mv), latency (5.90 ms - 6.34 ms), area (5.62 ms/mv - 6.72 ms/mv) and duration (13.77 ms - 15.37 ms). Conclusion: The best point of phrenic nerve stimulus in the neck varies among individuals between the medial and lateral border of the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and stimulation of both sites, then choosing the best phrenic nerve response, seems to be the appropriate procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document