A look inside the nonprofit boardroom: Influences on decision comprehensiveness and decision quality

Author(s):  
Pooya Tabesh ◽  
Phillip M. Jolly
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1872907
Author(s):  
Lukman Nul Hakim ◽  
Guritnaningsih A. Santoso ◽  
Bagus Takwin ◽  
Yos Sunitiyoso ◽  
Juneman Abraham

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3559
Author(s):  
Charleen I. Theroux ◽  
Kylie N. Hill ◽  
Anna L. Olsavsky ◽  
James L. Klosky ◽  
Nicholas D. Yeager ◽  
...  

Half of male childhood cancer survivors experience treatment-related fertility impairment, which can lead to distress. Survivors often regret forgoing fertility preservation (FP), and decisional dissatisfaction is associated with a lower quality of life. This mixed methods study examined short-term FP decisional satisfaction among families of male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer who received an initial fertility consult and completed an FP values clarification tool. One-two months after the FP decision, thirty-nine families completed the Brief Subjective Decision Quality measure. Decisional satisfaction was compared for participants (mothers, fathers, adolescents) who did and did not attempt to bank. Semi-structured interviews included the following question: How do you/your family feel about the banking decision now/in the future? Decisional quality scores were moderate-high (M = 5.74–6.33 out of 7), with no significant differences between non-attempter (n = 15) and attempter (n = 24) families (adolescents: p = 0.83, d = 0.08; mothers: p = 0.18, d = 0.45; fathers: p = 0.32, d = 0.44). Three qualitative themes emerged among non-attempter families: (1) satisfaction with decision (50% of participants), (2) acceptance of decision (60%), and (3) potential for future regret (40%). Satisfaction with decision was the only theme identified in attempter families (93%). Quantitively, short-term decisional satisfaction was high regardless of the banking attempt. However, the qualitative findings suggest that the experiences of families who did not bank may be more nuanced, as several participants discussed a potential for future regret, highlighting the importance of ongoing support.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 364-364
Author(s):  
Michaela Clark ◽  
Julie Hicks Patrick ◽  
Michaela Reardon

Abstract Consumer tasks permit an ecologically-valid context in which to examine the contributions of affective and cognitive resources to decision-making processes and outcomes. Although previous work shows that cognitive factors are important when individuals make decisions (Patrick et al., 2013; Queen et al.), the role of affective components is less clear. We examine these issues in two studies. Study 1 used data from 1000+ adults to inform a cluster analysis examining affective aspects (importance, meaningfulness) of making different types of decisions. A 4-cluster solution resulted. In Study 2, we used affective cluster membership and cognitive performance as predictors of experimental decision-making outcomes among a subset of participants (N = 60). Results of the regression (F(2, 40) = 6.51, p < .01, R2 = .25.) revealed that both the affective clusters (b = .37, p = .01) and cognitive ability (b = -.30, p = .04) uniquely contributed to the variance explained in decision quality. Age did not uniquely contribute. Results are discussed in the context of developing measures that enable us to move the field forward.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Pierre Hsieh ◽  
Imen Tebourbi ◽  
Wen‐Min Lu ◽  
Nai‐Yu Liu

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 880-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis A. Taylor ◽  
Richard A. Cosier ◽  
Daniel C. Ganster

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Matheson ◽  
Michael M. Menke

Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (18) ◽  
pp. 1609-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen R. Sepucha ◽  
Sandra Feibelmann ◽  
William A. Abdu ◽  
Catharine F. Clay ◽  
Carol Cosenza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document