Abstract
The German cooperative study group for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (COALL-92) was designed to examine the clinical effectiveness of thioguanine (TG) versus mercaptopurine (MP) in maintenance treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a randomized multicenter trial. TG and MP are prodrugs and have to be converted intracellularly to 6-thioguanine nucleotides (TGNs) for cytostatic activity. TG is converted into TGN in fewer steps and has been shown to be more cytotoxic in equimolar doses in vitro compared with 6-MP. Therefore, a higher effectiveness of TG in maintenance treatment was postulated. Of 521 patients enrolled into the protocol, 474 were randomized to receive either MP or TG during maintenance therapy in a daily oral dose. After a median observation time of 6.6 years, the probability of event-free survival was 79% ± 3% for the MP group (238 children) and 78% ± 3% in the TG group (236 patients). In spite of TGN levels, exceeding those of the MP group 7 times, treatment with TG did not improve the outcome but was more complicated to handle due to a specific toxicity profile of prolonged myelosuppression with marked thrombocytopenia. Therefore, MP should remain the preferred drug for maintenance treatment of ALL, unless other studies demonstrate superiority of TG in larger trials or selected patient groups.
Parental functioning during maintenance treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Effects of treatment intensity and dexamethasone pulses
