Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Platelet‐rich Plasma for Achilles Tendinopathy

PM&R ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1169-1176
Author(s):  
Adam Tenforde ◽  
David Robinson ◽  
Joanne Borg‐Stein ◽  
Haylee Borgstrom ◽  
Jaspal Ricky Singh
2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem EL-Mallah ◽  
Enas A. Elattar

Abstract Background Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is considered the commonest tendon pathology, occurring mainly in athletes. Different conservative treatment options have been introduced but with short-term effects; however, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and mesotherapy (MT) injections were claimed to provide longer effects and could be used in cases failure of response to conservative treatments. The objective of our prospective 12-week study was to compare the effect of ESWT and MT on chronic Achilles tendinopathy in athletes by both clinical and ultrasonographical assessment. Results Forty patients with chronic AT diagnosed clinically and with high-resolution ultrasound (US) randomly allocated in two groups first received weekly ESWT session, and the other group underwent weekly MT sessions for 4 consecutive weeks. Both groups improved during the treatment and follow-up period. The mean visual analogue score (VAS) decreased in both the ESWT group and the MT group. Mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score and VAS scores were not significantly different between ESWT and MT groups at the 4th and the 12th week of follow-up. However, US assessment significantly improved after 12 weeks in the ESWT group (as regards tendon thickness, calcifications, and Doppler signal), and for the mesotherapy group, there was the only improvement of tendon thickness. Conclusion ESWT showed improvement of pain and inflammation and calcifications of AT than MT injections, which was documented by US improved findings at week 12 follow up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
BaiLi Yan ◽  
Yuan Wan ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
MengTing Pan ◽  
Cheng Zhou

Object. In this study, our aim is to evaluate the efficiency of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on chronic Achilles tendinopathy (CAT) with different courses of disease. Methods. The data of 66 patients with CAT received ESWT was reviewed. According to the disease courses, those cases were allocated to short-term group (ST group, symptom duration 3-6 months) and long-term group (LT group, symptom duration >6 months). Propensity scores match (PSM) method was conducted to eliminate the confound factors in baseline features including gender, sport history, sides, type of CAT, BMI (body mass index), age, and scores evaluated by AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) and VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) before ESWT. After balancing the features between ST and LT group, postinterventional VAS, AOFAS, and rate of Likert satisfaction scale at the 3rd month after first ESWT was statistically analyzed. Results. Among the baseline features in ST and LT group, gender (female ratio, 44.4% vs 71.4%, p=0.041) and BMI (23.26±2.15 vs 24.63±2.41, p=0.024) were identified as confound factors. After elimination of biased features with PSM, 3 months after first ESWT, AOFAS and VAS in both groups are significantly improved, when compared with their scores at baseline (p<0.01). Moreover, at postintervention month 3 (PIM3), AOFAS in ST group is significantly higher than LT group (85.08±9.83 vs 76.76±9.85, t=76.76±9.85, p=0.019), and the rate of Likert satisfaction in ST group is better than LT group; although, it did not reach but close to significant level (70.6% vs 47.1%, χ2=1.943, p=0.163). However, there is no statistical difference of VAS scores between two groups after ESWT (1.96±0.98 vs 2.24±1.29, t=0.703, p=0.487). Conclusions. ESWT could effectively relieve pain and improve function of hind foot in patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy, and especially, it could offer better benefit on functional improvement in patients with short duration of CAT symptom.


The Foot ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Taylor ◽  
Sarah Dunkerley ◽  
David Silver ◽  
Andrew Redfern ◽  
Nick Talbot ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah K Steere ◽  
Stephanie DeLuca ◽  
Joanne Borg-Stein ◽  
Gerard A Malanga ◽  
Adam S Tenforde

ABSTRACT Introduction Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has a wide variety of clinical applications ranging from urology to orthopedics. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is of particular interest to military medicine in the treatment of diverse musculoskeletal injuries, including recalcitrant tendinopathy. Much of the evidence for ESWT is from studies in the civilian population, including athletes. A few investigations have been conducted within military personnel. Musculoskeletal conditions within military personnel may contribute to pain and physical limitations. Optimal functional outcomes could be achieved through ESWT. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current evidence on the efficacy of ESWT the in management of lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries in the military. Further, we explore the relative efficacy of ESWT compared to regenerative medicine procedures, including studies with treatment using platelet-rich plasma. Materials and Methods A literature review was performed in April 2020 to identify studies evaluating the use of ESWT for lower extremity conditions commonly observed in military personnel, including plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinopathy, patellar tendinopathy, medial tibial stress syndrome, and knee arthritis. The literature search was completed by two researchers independently, using PubMed and Embase databases and same search terms. Disagreements were adjudicated by a senior author. Due to the paucity of relevant search results, the search term parameters were expanded to incorporate active participants. Results Two studies evaluated the use of ESWT in a military population for lower extremity injuries. This included a randomized control trial in active military with medial tibial stress syndrome and an unblinded retrospective study for the chronic plantar fasciitis condition. Both studies in the military had favorable outcomes in the use of ESWT compared to other treatment arms. The remaining studies predominantly included athletes. Although heterogeneity on the quality of the studies may prevent meta-analysis and limit the generalization of the findings, the majority of studies demonstrated an improvement in pain and return to activity using ESWT. Two studies using platelet-rich plasma as a treatment arm identified similar short-term outcomes compared to ESWT for Achilles tendinopathy and patellar tendinopathy. Conclusion Our findings suggest that ESWT is a safe and well-tolerated intervention with positive outcomes for lower extremity conditions commonly seen in the military. The few studies comparing ESWT to PRP suggest regenerative benefits similar to orthobiologics in the shorter term. More robust quality designed research may enable the evaluation of ESWT efficacy within the military population. In summary, the use of ESWT may provide pain reduction and improved function in active populations with lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries. Further research in the military is needed to evaluate shockwave efficacy in order to advance musculoskeletal care and improve outcomes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 466-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fridman ◽  
Jarrett D. Cain ◽  
Lowell Weil ◽  
Lowell Weil

Background: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic tendon pathology in the elbow, shoulder, and plantar fascia. This prospective study examines the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of chronic Achilles tendon disorders. Methods: Twenty-three patients (23 feet) were treated with extracorporeal shockwave therapy for Achilles tendinosis, insertional tendonitis, or both. Indications for treatment were a minimum of 6 months of conservative care, and a visual analog pain score &gt; 5. The mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 4–35 months). Results: Ninety-one percent (14 patients) were satisfied or very satisfied (23 patients) with treatment. Eighty-seven percent (20 patients) stated that extracorporeal shockwave therapy improved their condition, 13% (3 patients) said it did not affect the condition, and none stated that it made them worse. Eighty-seven percent (20 patients) stated they would have the procedure again if given the choice. Four months after extracorporeal shockwave therapy, the mean visual analog score for morning pain decreased from 7.0 to 2.3, and activity pain decreased from 8.1 to 3.1. Conclusion: High-power extracorporeal shockwave therapy is safe, noninvasive, and effective, and it has a role in the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathy. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(6): 466–468, 2008)


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siwadol Pinitkwamdee ◽  
Sukij Laohajaroensombat ◽  
Jakrapong Orapin ◽  
Patarawan Woratanarat

Background: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been proposed as a conservative treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy from limited evidence without placebo controls. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of ESWT compared with sham controls in chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Methods: A double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial was conducted between 2016 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 70 years diagnosed with chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy who failed standard conservative treatment. After computerized randomization, patients were allocated into either low-energy ESWT or sham control. Pain, function, and other complaints were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and VAS foot and ankle (VAS-FA) at preintervention and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, and 24. Intention-to-treat analysis and repeated measurement were performed using STATA 15.0. Results: Sixteen patients in ESWT and 15 patients in sham control groups had nonsignificant different baseline characteristics with preintervention VAS (6.0 ± 2.6 vs 5.2 ± 2.2) and VAS-FA (64.8 ± 16.6 vs 65.3 ± 12.7). There was no significant difference in VAS, VAS-FA, and its domains in the long term between the 2 groups. In addition, the ESWT group had significant improvement in VAS (2.9 ± 2.2) at weeks 4 to 12, and sham controls group had significantly improved VAS (2.3 ± 2.6) at weeks 12 to 24. Complications were found only after ESWT treatment. Conclusion: There was no difference at 24 weeks with the use of low-energy ESWT for chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy, especially in elderly patients. However, it may provide a short period of therapeutic effects as early as weeks 4 to 12. Level of Evidence: Level I, randomized controlled study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document