The Politics of War Powers: The Theory and History of Presidential Unilateralism by Sarah Burns. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas, 2019. 328 pp. $27.95.

2021 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-180
Author(s):  
Clement Fatovic
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1145-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHI-KWAN MARK

From late 1956 onwards, British colonial officials spoke of the postwar influx of Chinese refugees from the mainland to Hong Kong as a ‘problem of people’, with serious consequences on housing, social services and even political relations. The problem was also one of an international concern: both Communist and Nationalist China and the United States saw it in the wider context of their Cold War struggles. At first, the Hong Kong government was ambivalent about providing massive relief for the refugees, either by itself or by the United Nations. But by the late 1950s and early 1960s, the political importance of turning potential rioters into responsible citizens, and the Cold War implications of great powers' involvement convinced British colonials that the only lasting solution to the problem was not overseas emigration (with outside aid) but full local integration (through trade and industrialization). The international history of the Chinese refugee problem epitomizes the local history of the Cold War over Hong Kong.


Grotiana ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-370
Author(s):  
Rotem Giladi

Abstract This article starts with a critical reflection on John Westlake’s reading of the history of empire and the English/British East India Company – for him, essentially, the proper concern of ‘constitutional history’ rather than international law. For Westlake, approaching this history through the prism of nineteenth-century positivist doctrine, the Company’s exercise of war powers could only result from state delegation. Against his warnings to international lawyers not to stray from the proper boundaries of international legal inquiry, the article proceeds to recover Hugo Grotius’s theory of corporate belligerency in his early treatise De iure praedae. For Grotius, corporations could wage public war on behalf of the state yet, at the same time, were in law capable of waging private war in their own right. The article proceeds to reflect on the practice of corporate belligerency in the centuries separating Westlake and Grotius; it concludes with observations on the implications of Grotius’s theory of corporate belligerency today.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document