scholarly journals CASINO: A new monte carlo code in C language for electron beam interactions-part II: Tabulated values of the mott cross section

Scanning ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Drouin ◽  
Pierre Hovington ◽  
Raynald Gauvin
Scanning ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Hovington ◽  
Dominique Drouin ◽  
Raynald Gauvin

Scanning ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Hovington ◽  
Dominique Drouin ◽  
Raynald Gauvin ◽  
David C. Joy ◽  
Neal Evans

2021 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 108603
Author(s):  
Antti Rintala ◽  
Ville Valtavirta ◽  
Jaakko Leppänen

1999 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Cláudia V. Rodrigues ◽  
Antônio Mário Magalhães

AbstractWe have modelled the observed random variation in broad band intensity and polarization of some isolated Wolf-Rayet stars assuming that their winds have localized, enhanced density regions (blobs). Our model is based on a Monte Carlo code that treats all Stokes parameters of the radiation bundle. This study indicates that the blobs must have sizes comparable to the stellar dimension and be near the base of the envelope. These blobs can be interpreted as a variable structure of large geometric cross section causing the observed polarimetric and photometric variability.


1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 887-888
Author(s):  
John T. Armstrong ◽  
D. E. Newbury ◽  
P. K. Carpenter

Determination of the variation of absolute and relative electron-excited x-ray production rates as a function of electron beam energy and sample atomic number is necessary for calculation of the "stopping power" atomic number correction and the relative amount of characteristic fluorescence and for development of “standardless” and Monte Carlo algorithms for quantitative x-ray analysis. Critical to the calculation of x-ray production rates is an accurate expression for the inner shell electron ionization cross section. A large number of expressions have been proposed for the relative x-ray production rates (used in the fluorescence correction)1 and for the ionization cross section used in the atomic number correction, and these yield quite different results. In order to evaluate which expressions gave the most accurate results when applied to quantitative x-ray emission measurements, we performed a series of high precision measurements of x-ray intensities as a function of electron beam accelerating potential for a series of pure element and simple oxide, phosphide, sulfide, and chloride standards for 65 elements ranging in Z from C to U


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document