scholarly journals Corporate social responsibility and access to finance

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beiting Cheng ◽  
Ioannis Ioannou ◽  
George Serafeim



2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 10912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Ioannou ◽  
George Serafeim ◽  
Beiting Cheng


2020 ◽  
pp. 000765031989883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel-María García-Sánchez ◽  
Nazim Hussain ◽  
Sana-Akbar Khan ◽  
Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero

This article analyzes the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) decoupling and financial market outcomes. CSR decoupling refers to the gap between CSR disclosure and CSR performance. More specifically, we analyze the effect of CSR decoupling on analysts’ forecast errors, cost of capital, and access to finance. We also examine the moderating effect of forecast errors on relationships between CSR decoupling and cost of capital and access to finance. For a sample of U.S. firms consisting of 7,681 firm-year observations for the period 2006–2015, our empirical evidence supports the idea that a wider gap results in higher analysts’ forecast errors, a greater cost of capital, and reduced access to finance. In addition, our results show that forecast errors enhance the effect of the CSR decoupling on cost of capital and access to financial resources. We also note that external monitoring, in the form of greater analysts’ coverage, reduces CSR decoupling.



2019 ◽  
Vol VOLUME 8 (2019) ◽  
pp. 206-240
Author(s):  
Anthony Adu-Asare Idun ◽  
Joshua Gamado

This study investigates the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and access to finance, using data from companies listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE). The study adopted multiple regression in investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) in terms of profitability (measured by return on equity – ROE) and philanthropy (measured by corporate social responsibility disclosures – CSRED), and access to finance (measured by growth in equity, retained earnings, debt and working capital). Economic responsibility and access to finance measured by growth in retain earnings are negatively and insignificantly associated. Discretionary responsibility has positive and significantly relationship with growth in equity capital. Again, economic responsibility is negatively and insignificantly related to growth in debt stock, while discretionary responsibility is positively and significantly associated with growth in debt stock. Finally, economic responsibility is negatively related to growth in working capital, while discretionary responsibility is positively related to growth in working capital, but both cases are significant. The study encourages firms to embark on higher-level social responsibility since that can alleviate access to finance challenges faced by firms.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document