Seismic performance of steel mega braced frames equipped with shape-memory alloy braces under near-fault earthquakes

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davoud Vafaei ◽  
Reyhaneh Eskandari
2014 ◽  
Vol 680 ◽  
pp. 263-266
Author(s):  
Saber Moradi ◽  
M. Shahria Alam

Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is a technique to determine the overall seismic performance of structures under varied intensities of earthquakes. In this paper, the seismic performance of four-story steel braced frames equipped with superelastic Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) braces is assessed by performing IDA. The seismic response of SMA-braced frames was compared to that of corresponding Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs). Based on the results of this comparative study, the SMA-braced frames were generally effective in reducing maximum interstory drifts and permanent roof deformations. In addition, the SMA-braced frames demonstrated more uniform drift distribution over the height of the building. As the intensity of earthquake excitation increases, a higher response reduction can be expected for SMA-braced frames.


2018 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 579-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Fang ◽  
Qiuming Zhong ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Shuling Hu ◽  
Canxing Qiu

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050001
Author(s):  
Jize Mao ◽  
Daoguang Jia ◽  
Zailin Yang ◽  
Nailiang Xiang

Lack of corrosion resistance and post-earthquake resilience will inevitably result in a considerable loss of function for concrete bridge piers with conventional steel reinforcement. As an alternative to steel reinforcement, shape memory alloy (SMA)-based reinforcing bars are emerging for improving the seismic performance of concrete bridge piers. This paper presents an assessment of concrete bridge piers with different reinforcement alternatives, namely steel reinforcement, steel-SMA hybrid reinforcement and SMA reinforcement. The bridge piers with different reinforcements are designed having a same lateral resistance, or in other words, the flexural capacities of plastic hinges are designed equal. Based on this, numerical studies are conducted to investigate the relative performance of different bridge piers under seismic loadings. Seismic responses in terms of the maximum drift, residual drift as well as dissipated energy are obtained and compared. The results show that all the three cases with different reinforcements exhibit similar maximum drifts for different earthquake magnitudes. The SMA-reinforced bridge pier has the smallest post-earthquake residual displacement and dissipated energy, whereas the steel-reinforced pier shows the opposite responses. The steel-SMA hybrid reinforcement can achieve a reasonable balance between the residual deformation and energy dissipation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document