scholarly journals P05.08: Prenatal diagnosis of triplet pregnancy discordant for Edwards syndrome

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-561
Author(s):  
D. F. Albu ◽  
C. Albu ◽  
E. Severin ◽  
A. Toma ◽  
M. Dumitrescu
2001 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Graham ◽  
Kwame Anyane-Yeboa ◽  
Anja Raams ◽  
Esther Appeldoorn ◽  
Wim J. Kleijer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M.A. Ivko, T.L. Servatovich , L.K. Pobedinskaya

The case of early prenatal diagnosis of vesico-allantoic cyst in conjunction with Edwards syndrome is presented. Diagnosis was established at 12 weeks of gestation. During the screening of fetal survey further revealed the absence stomach in a typical place, abnormal position of the right foot. Prenatal karyotyping is peformed, fetal karyotype — 47,XY+18. After prenatal counseling pregnancy was terminated. Postmortem examination confirmed the prenatal diagnosis.


Author(s):  
Yusrawati Yusrawati ◽  
Yudha M Kartika

Objective: To report a case of trisomy 18 diagnosed in prenatal care. Methods: Case report. Case: A 24 years old primigravida woman was diagnosed with term pregnancy (37-38 weeks) with an intrauterine singleton live fetus with Edwards syndrome. In 15-16 weeks of pregnancy the omphalocele was discovered using ultrasound. Subsequently, amniocentesis was performed and the chromosome analysis result showed Edwards syndrome (47, XX +18). The patient chose to continue the pregnancy until term. In this patient, elective CS was performed at term pregnancy, involving teamwork between obstetrics and perinatology. A female baby was born weighing 1720 grams, 40 cm body length, and APGAR score of 5/7. The congenital anomalies discovered include umbilical hernia, rocker bottom feet, clenched hands, low set malformed ears, and a single umbilical artery. The baby was born with asphyxia, improved after resuscitation, and required treatment in the NICU. Pediatric surgeons planned umbilical hernia repair. Furthermore, because of the presence of suspected esophageal atresia, the baby was planned for gastrotomy, which was delayed because the baby was experiencing desaturation. Because of the unstable condition of the baby, echocardiography and gastrotomy were not done until the 18th day of treatment. At the 18th day, the baby’s condition deteriorated and the baby died with metabolic acidosis. Conclusion: Edwards syndrome can be diagnosed in the prenatal period by risk factors consideration, maternal serum markers, and ultrasonographic identification of organ abnormalities. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 3-4: 234-238] Keywords: Edwards syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, trisomy 18, ultrasound


Haemophilia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. e228-e230
Author(s):  
S. Shanbhag ◽  
C. Lulla ◽  
K. Ghosh ◽  
S. Shetty

Teratology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 278-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
She Min Zeng ◽  
Jerome Yankowitz ◽  
Jeffrey C. Murray

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Yong ◽  
Duncan F. Farquharson ◽  
Jagdeep Ubhi

2012 ◽  
pp. 25-36
Author(s):  
Phan Tuong Quynh Le ◽  
Viet Nhan Nguyen

Objectives: Design an “in-house” software for calculating the risk of fetus has Down syndrome, Edwards syndrome and open neural tube defects in prenatal screening at the gestational age 15-22. Methods: Based on the Excel program of Microsoft Office and the articles with the Excel of Microsoft Office and the related articles have been published. Results: In cases have the risk of trisomy 21 with the range from 1/251 to 1/350: the risk tends to be lower than Prisca (83.7%). In cases have the high risks of trisomy 21 in screening but the results of prenatal diagnosis are not trisomy: the risks of “in house” software are lower than the risks of Prisca (73%) with 29% of cases has the risks less than 1/250. In cases of trisomy 18 with the risks are lower than 1/150: there are statistical significant differences between the two softwares (P <0.05). In screening open neural tube defects, the cases have the threshold higher than 1.50 MoM AFP: The results in the “in house” software tend to higher than Prisca (94%). The cases have the threshold lower than 1.50 MoM AFP: Where the disability screening of neural tube openings with thresholds lower than 1.5 MoM AFP: there are no statistical significant differences between the two softwares (P >0.05). Conclusion: The “in house” software has all the necessary functions for calculating the risk of Down syndrome, Edwards syndrome and open neural tube at the gestational age 15-22.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document