Prognostic Value of DNA Ploidy and S-Phase Fraction in Endometrial Cancer Stage I and II: A Prospective 5-Year Survival Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars-Gösta Friberg ◽  
Håkan Norén ◽  
Ulla Delle
1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobus Pfisterer ◽  
Friedrich Kommoss ◽  
Willi Sauerbrei ◽  
Ina Rendl ◽  
Marion Kiechle ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 147-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Wimberger ◽  
Peter Hillemanns ◽  
Thomas Kapsner ◽  
Hermann Hepp ◽  
Rainer Kimmig

In gynecologic oncology valid prognostic factors are necessary to define biologically similar subgroups for analysis of therapeutic efficacy. This study is the first published prospective study concerning prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and S‐phase fraction in cervical and endometrial cancer following enrichment of tumor cells by cytokeratin labelling. Epithelial cells were labeled by FITC‐conjugated cytokeratin antibody (CK 5, 6, 8, and CK 17) prior to flow cytometric cell cycle analysis in 91 specimens of cervical cancer and 73 samples of endometrial cancer. In cervical cancer neither DNA‐ploidy nor S‐phase fraction were relevant prognostic parameters. But CV of the G0G1‐peak showed prognostic relevance in cervical cancer cells, even in multivariate analysis. This interesting observation, however, seems to have no therapeutic consequence due to the small discrimination capacity of CV. In endometrial carcinoma, gross DNA‐aneuploidy (DNA‐index > 1.3) and a high percentage of proliferating cells (>75th percentile) were univariate and multivariate highly significant prognostic factors for recurrence‐free survival. Especially DNA‐aneuploidy (DI>1.3) is one of the most important independent molecular biological prognostic factors. While diagnostic curettage we could identify risk patients even preoperatively by determination of the prognostic factors like histologic tumor type, grading, cervical involvement and DNA‐ploidy. Thereby these patients could be treated primarily in an oncologic center. In conclusion, our investigations showed that the determination of DNA‐ploidy should be done in endometrial carcinoma. In cervical cancer no clinical significance for determination of DNA‐parameters was found.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-311
Author(s):  
Teresia Svanvik ◽  
Ulf Strömberg ◽  
Erik Holmberg ◽  
Janusz Marcickiewicz ◽  
Karin Sundfeldt

ObjectivesTo assess the effects on relative survival of established and new prognostic factors in stage I–III grade 1–3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and in the subgroup of stage I grade 1–2.MethodsThis was a population-based, retrospective study including all women (n=1113) in the western Swedish healthcare region diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–III grade 1–3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in 2006–2011. Histology, grade, stage, and age were prospectively reported to the regional clinical and national cancer registers. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction were analyzed by flow cytometer. S-phase fraction cut-off was set at ≥8%. Tumor biopsies were classified as diploid if there was one G0/G1 peak or the DNA index was 1.0±0.04. Overexpression of p53 as determined by immunohistochemistry was positive if strong nuclear staining was found in >30% of the neoplastic cells.ResultsBased on univariable statistical analyses we found that 5-year relative survival was significantly associated with S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy, p53, stage, grade, and age. Excess mortality for S-phase fraction ≥8%, aneuploidy, and p53 overexpression was 8, 14, and 8 and times higher, respectively. However, in a multivariable regression model, adjusted for stage, grade, and age, S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy, and p53 were not statistically independent prognostic factors (p=0.413, p=0.107, p=0.208, respectively) for 5-year relative survival in stage I–III grade 1–3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. In a subgroup analysis of stage I grade 1–2, aneuploidy identified a subgroup with impaired 5-year relative survival.ConclusionWe can conclude that S-phase fraction, DNA ploidy, and p53 overexpression did not improve identification of high-risk patients by stage, grade, and age in stage I–III endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. In stage I, aneuploidy and grade 2 predicted lower relative survival rates than other variables.


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Von Minckwitz ◽  
W. Kuhn ◽  
M. Kaufmann ◽  
G.E. Feichter ◽  
J. Heep ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document