scholarly journals A Normal Form of Hamiltonian Systems of Several Time Variables with a Regular Singularity

1996 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Kimura ◽  
Atusi Matumiya ◽  
Kyoichi Takano
Author(s):  
Shahriar Aslani ◽  
Patrick Bernard

Abstract In the study of Hamiltonian systems on cotangent bundles, it is natural to perturb Hamiltonians by adding potentials (functions depending only on the base point). This led to the definition of Mañé genericity [ 8]: a property is generic if, given a Hamiltonian $H$, the set of potentials $g$ such that $H+g$ satisfies the property is generic. This notion is mostly used in the context of Hamiltonians that are convex in $p$, in the sense that $\partial ^2_{pp} H$ is positive definite at each point. We will also restrict our study to this situation. There is a close relation between perturbations of Hamiltonians by a small additive potential and perturbations by a positive factor close to one. Indeed, the Hamiltonians $H+g$ and $H/(1-g)$ have the same level one energy surface, hence their dynamics on this energy surface are reparametrisation of each other, this is the Maupertuis principle. This remark is particularly relevant when $H$ is homogeneous in the fibers (which corresponds to Finsler metrics) or even fiberwise quadratic (which corresponds to Riemannian metrics). In these cases, perturbations by potentials of the Hamiltonian correspond, up to parametrisation, to conformal perturbations of the metric. One of the widely studied aspects is to understand to what extent the return map associated to a periodic orbit can be modified by a small perturbation. This kind of question depends strongly on the context in which they are posed. Some of the most studied contexts are, in increasing order of difficulty, perturbations of general vector fields, perturbations of Hamiltonian systems inside the class of Hamiltonian systems, perturbations of Riemannian metrics inside the class of Riemannian metrics, and Mañé perturbations of convex Hamiltonians. It is for example well known that each vector field can be perturbed to a vector field with only hyperbolic periodic orbits, this is part of the Kupka–Smale Theorem, see [ 5, 13] (the other part of the Kupka–Smale Theorem states that the stable and unstable manifolds intersect transversally; it has also been studied in the various settings mentioned above but will not be discussed here). In the context of Hamiltonian vector fields, the statement has to be weakened, but it remains true that each Hamiltonian can be perturbed to a Hamiltonian with only non-degenerate periodic orbits (including the iterated ones), see [ 11, 12]. The same result is true in the context of Riemannian metrics: every Riemannian metric can be perturbed to a Riemannian metric with only non-degenerate closed geodesics, this is the bumpy metric theorem, see [ 1, 2, 4]. The question was investigated only much more recently in the context of Mañé perturbations of convex Hamiltonians, see [ 9, 10]. It is proved in [ 10] that the same result holds: if $H$ is a convex Hamiltonian and $a$ is a regular value of $H$, then there exist arbitrarily small potentials $g$ such that all periodic orbits (including iterated ones) of $H+g$ at energy $a$ are non-degenerate. The proof given in [ 10] is actually rather similar to the ones given in papers on the perturbations of Riemannian metrics. In all these proofs, it is very useful to work in appropriate coordinates around an orbit segment. In the Riemannian case, one can use the so-called Fermi coordinates. In the Hamiltonian case, appropriate coordinates are considered in [ 10,Lemma 3.1] itself taken from [ 3, Lemma C.1]. However, as we shall detail below, the proof of this Lemma in [ 3], Appendix C, is incomplete, and the statement itself is actually wrong. Our goal in the present paper is to state and prove a corrected version of this normal form Lemma. Our proof is different from the one outlined in [ 3], Appendix C. In particular, it is purely Hamiltonian and does not rest on the results of [ 7] on Finsler metrics, as [ 3] did. Although our normal form is weaker than the one claimed in [ 10], it is actually sufficient to prove the main results of [ 6, 10], as we shall explain after the statement of Theorem 1, and probably also of the other works using [ 3, Lemma C.1].


1991 ◽  
Vol 153 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Miranda Filho ◽  
R.F.S. Andrade

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (09) ◽  
pp. 2177-2191
Author(s):  
ERIC A. BUTCHER ◽  
S. C. SINHA

A technique for constructing the transformations to real Hamiltonian normal forms of linear Hamiltonian systems via permutation matrices is presented. In particular, a method is shown for obtaining the symplectomorphism between the symplectic basis of the real Jordan form to the standard symplectic basis in which the real Hamiltonian normal form resides. All possible degeneracies are accounted for since the algebraic and geometric multiplicities of nonsemisimple eigenvalues are not restricted, including the "difficult" cases of zero and imaginary eigenvalues. Since the normal forms are not unique, several possible arrangements of the suggested transformations are given which result in the various normal forms derived previously as well as in a few new ones for degenerate cases which have not appeared before.


2003 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 449-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Palacián ◽  
Patricia Yanguas

In the present paper we study polynomial Hamiltonian systems depending on one or various real parameters. We determine the values that these parameters should take in order to be able to construct formal (asymptotic) integrals of the system. In this respect, a method to calculate the formal integrals of a polynomial Hamiltonian vector field is presented. The original Hamilton function represents a family of dynamical systems composed by a principal part (quadratic terms) plus the perturbation (terms of degree three or bigger). We extend an integral of the principal part to the perturbed system by means of Lie transformations for autonomous Hamiltonian systems. Thus, the procedure is carried out order by order starting with polynomials of degree three. We obtain the conditions that the external parameters have to satisfy so that the integral of the quadratic terms persists for the whole system up to a certain order of approximation. Once the formal integral is computed the departure system has been transformed into a generalized normal form, i.e. a system which is equivalent to the initial one but easier to be analysed by making use of reduction theory. The truncated normal form defines a system with less degrees of freedom than the original Hamiltonian and is written exactly in terms of the polynomial first integrals associated to the quadratic part of the new integral and it contains the qualitative description of the initial system. The theory is illustrated with two examples borrowed from Physics.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1853-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIDEKAZU ITO

AbstractWe study Birkhoff normalization in connection with superintegrability of ann-degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian systemXHwith holomorphic HamiltonianH. Without assuming any Poisson commuting relation among integrals, we prove that, if the system XHhasn+qholomorphic integrals near an equilibrium point of resonance degreeq≥0, there exists a holomorphic Birkhoff transformation φ such thatH∘φ becomes a holomorphic function ofn−qvariables and thatXH∘φcan be solved explicitly. Furthermore, the Birkhoff normal formH∘φ is determined uniquely, independently of the choice of φ, as convergent power series. We also show that the systemXHis superintegrable in the sense of Mischenko–Fomenko as well as Liouville-integrable near the equilibrium point.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document