Quantitative Refinement of Calibrated14C Distributions

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn P. Biasi ◽  
Ray Weldon

AbstractA new method is presented for using known ordering or other relationships between14C samples to reduce14C dating uncertainty. The order of sample formation is often known from, for example, stratigraphic superposition, dendrochronology, or crosscutting field relations. Constraints such as a minimum time between dates and limits from historical information are also readily included. Dendrochronologically calibrated calendric date histograms initially represent each date. The method uses Bayes theorem and the relational constraints to upweight date ranges in each date distribution consistent with the other date distributions and the constraints, and downweight unlikely portions. The reweighted date distributions retain all dating possibilities present in the initial calibrated date distributions, but each date in the result now reflects the extra information such as ordering supplied through the constraints. In addition, one may add information incrementally, and thus analyze systematically its effect on all the date distributions. Thus, the method can be used to assess the consistency of the quantitative data at hand. The Bayesian approach also uses the empirical calibrated date distributions directly, so information is not lost prematurely by summarized dates to a mean and variance or "confidence intervals." The approach is illustrated with data from two densely sampled paleoseismic sites on the San Andreas Fault in southern California. An average reduction in14C date distribution variance of 59% is achieved using ordering information alone, and 85% is achieved by also applying sedimentation rate constraints and historical information.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared C. Allen

Background: Bayesian approaches to police decision support offer an improvement upon more commonly used statistical approaches. Common approaches to case decision support often involve using frequencies from cases similar to the case under consideration to come to an isolated likelihood that a given suspect either a) committed the crime or b) has a given characteristic or set of characteristics. The Bayesian approach, in contrast, offers formally contextualized estimates and utilizes the formal logic desired by investigators. Findings: Bayes’ theorem incorporates the isolated likelihood as one element of a three-part equation, the other parts being 1) what was known generally about the variables in the case prior to the case occurring (the scientific-theoretical priors) and 2) the relevant base rate information that contextualizes the evidence obtained (the event context). These elements are precisely the domain of decision support specialists (investigative advisers), and the Bayesian paradigm is uniquely apt for combining them into contextualized estimates for decision support. Conclusions: By formally combining the relevant knowledge, context, and likelihood, Bayes’ theorem can improve the logic, accuracy, and relevance of decision support statements.


1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 709-723
Author(s):  
B. F. Howell

Abstract Recurrence probabilities of earthquakes were evaluated at 33 locations along the San Andreas fault using Gumbel's method. Two minima in the mode of the largest annual earthquakes occur, one north of San Francisco centered around 38.75°N latitude and the other centered in the Carizzo Plain area at 35.25°N latitude. The latter is offset by an unusually large ratio of large to small earthquakes, so that only one minimum (around 38.75°N) is observed in the expected 100-yr earthquake size. This broad minimum closely coincides with where the San Andreas fault broke in 1906, and may be only temporary. There appears to be a slight, systematic tendency for the observed largest 50-year earthquake to become larger than the expected 50-yr earthquake as the size of the area being studied is reduced. The preferred explanation for this is that the pattern of size as a function of frequency becomes nonlinear when the size of the area studied is less than the focal area of the largest earthquakes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared C. Allen

Background: Bayesian approaches to police decision support offer an improvement upon more commonly used statistical approaches. Common approaches to case decision support often involve using frequencies from cases similar to the case under consideration to come to an isolated likelihood that a given suspect either a) committed the crime or b) has a given characteristic or set of characteristics. The Bayesian approach, in contrast, offers formally contextualized estimates and utilizes the formal logic desired by investigators. Findings: Bayes’ theorem incorporates the isolated likelihood as one element of a three-part equation, the other parts being 1) what was known generally about the variables in the case prior to the case occurring (the scientific-theoretical priors) and 2) the relevant base rate information that contextualizes the evidence obtained (the event context). These elements are precisely the domain of decision support specialists (investigative advisers), and the Bayesian paradigm is uniquely apt for combining them into contextualized estimates for decision support. Conclusions: By formally combining the relevant knowledge, context, and likelihood, Bayes’ theorem can improve the logic, accuracy, and relevance of decision support statements.


1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra S. Schulz ◽  
Robert E. Wallace

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document