Stability Analysis of Roll Grinding System with Double Time Delay Effects

Author(s):  
L. Yuan ◽  
E. Keskinen ◽  
V.M. Järvenpää
Volume 2 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihong Yuan ◽  
Veli-Matti Ja¨rvenpa¨a¨ ◽  
Erno Keskinen

In this paper dynamical analysis of a grinding process in steel roll manufacturing is studied. The main sources of the regenerative chatter are the time delay effects from both work piece and tool surfaces. The dynamical behaviors of the system have been described in a multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) simulation model and both responses of the roll and the grindstone motions have been considered. The conventional controllers are included in order to achieve the desired rotational speeds of the two spindles. The simulation results of the model with double time delays will be carried out and the special characteristics of the system stability relative to delays will be discussed through analysis.


Author(s):  
W. Griffin Sullivan ◽  
Isaac L. Howard

The Proctor test method, as specified in AASHTO T134 and ASTM D558, continues to play a vital role in design and construction quality control for soil-cement materials. However, neither test method establishes a methodology or standardized protocols to characterize the effects of time delay between cement addition and compaction, also known as compaction delay. Compaction delay has been well documented to have a notably negative effect on compactability, compressive strength, and overall performance of soil-cement materials, but specification tools to address this behavior are not prevalent. This paper aims to demonstrate the extent of compaction delay effects on several soil-cement mixtures used in Mississippi and to present recommended new test method protocols for AASHTO T134 to characterize compaction delay effects. Data presented showed that not all soil-cement mixtures are sensitive to compaction delay, but some mixtures can be very sensitive and lead to a meaningful decrease in specimen dry density. Recommended test method protocols were presented for AASHTO T134 and commentary was presented to provide state Departments of Transportation and other specifying agencies a few examples of how the new compaction delay protocols could be implemented.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Majid Ghorbani ◽  
Mahsan Tavakoli-Kakhki ◽  
Aleksei Tepljakov ◽  
Eduard Petlenkov ◽  
Arash Farnam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document