Author(s):  
Vinay Parameshwarappa ◽  
Laurent Pezard ◽  
Arnaud Jean Norena

In the auditory modality, noise trauma has often been used to investigate cortical plasticity as it causes cochlear hearing loss. One limitation of these past studies, however, is that the effects of noise trauma have been mostly documented at the granular layer, which is the main cortical recipient of thalamic inputs. Importantly, the cortex is composed of six different layers each having its own pattern of connectivity and specific role in sensory processing. The present study aims at investigating the effects of acute and chronic noise trauma on the laminar pattern of spontaneous activity in primary auditory cortex of the anesthetized guinea pig. We show that spontaneous activity is dramatically altered across cortical layers after acute and chronic noise-induced hearing loss. First, spontaneous activity was globally enhanced across cortical layers, both in terms of firing rate and amplitude of spike-triggered average of local field potentials. Second, current source density on (spontaneous) spike-triggered average of local field potentials indicates that current sinks develop in the supra- and infragranular layers. These latter results suggest that supragranular layers become a major input recipient and that the propagation of spontaneous activity over a cortical column is greatly enhanced after acute and chronic noise-induced hearing loss. We discuss the possible mechanisms and functional implications of these changes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A Hirsch ◽  
Luis M Martinez

1990 ◽  
pp. 369-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Guyot ◽  
F. Alexandre ◽  
J. P. Haton ◽  
Y. Burnod
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 364 (1521) ◽  
pp. 1203-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Hawkins ◽  
Dileep George ◽  
Jamie Niemasik

In this paper, we propose a mechanism which the neocortex may use to store sequences of patterns. Storing and recalling sequences are necessary for making predictions, recognizing time-based patterns and generating behaviour. Since these tasks are major functions of the neocortex, the ability to store and recall time-based sequences is probably a key attribute of many, if not all, cortical areas. Previously, we have proposed that the neocortex can be modelled as a hierarchy of memory regions, each of which learns and recalls sequences. This paper proposes how each region of neocortex might learn the sequences necessary for this theory. The basis of the proposal is that all the cells in a cortical column share bottom-up receptive field properties, but individual cells in a column learn to represent unique incidences of the bottom-up receptive field property within different sequences. We discuss the proposal, the biological constraints that led to it and some results modelling it.


NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 116862 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Bonaiuto ◽  
Fardin Afdideh ◽  
Maxime Ferez ◽  
Konrad Wagstyl ◽  
Jérémie Mattout ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1794-1807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori O’Hashi ◽  
Tomer Fekete ◽  
Thomas Deneux ◽  
Rina Hildesheim ◽  
Cees van Leeuwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 360 (1456) ◽  
pp. 837-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C Horton ◽  
Daniel L Adams

This year, the field of neuroscience celebrates the 50th anniversary of Mountcastle's discovery of the cortical column. In this review, we summarize half a century of research and come to the disappointing realization that the column may have no function. Originally, it was described as a discrete structure, spanning the layers of the somatosensory cortex, which contains cells responsive to only a single modality, such as deep joint receptors or cutaneous receptors. Subsequently, examples of columns have been uncovered in numerous cortical areas, expanding the original concept to embrace a variety of different structures and principles. A ‘column’ now refers to cells in any vertical cluster that share the same tuning for any given receptive field attribute. In striate cortex, for example, cells with the same eye preference are grouped into ocular dominance columns. Unaccountably, ocular dominance columns are present in some species, but not others. In principle, it should be possible to determine their function by searching for species differences in visual performance that correlate with their presence or absence. Unfortunately, this approach has been to no avail; no visual faculty has emerged that appears to require ocular dominance columns. Moreover, recent evidence has shown that the expression of ocular dominance columns can be highly variable among members of the same species, or even in different portions of the visual cortex in the same individual. These observations deal a fatal blow to the idea that ocular dominance columns serve a purpose. More broadly, the term ‘column’ also denotes the periodic termination of anatomical projections within or between cortical areas. In many instances, periodic projections have a consistent relationship with some architectural feature, such as the cytochrome oxidase patches in V1 or the stripes in V2. These tissue compartments appear to divide cells with different receptive field properties into distinct processing streams. However, it is unclear what advantage, if any, is conveyed by this form of columnar segregation. Although the column is an attractive concept, it has failed as a unifying principle for understanding cortical function. Unravelling the organization of the cerebral cortex will require a painstaking description of the circuits, projections and response properties peculiar to cells in each of its various areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document