Testing equivalence as a bisimulation equivalence

Author(s):  
Rance Cleaveland ◽  
Matthew Hennessy
1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rance Cleaveland ◽  
Matthew Hennessy

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (33) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Aceto ◽  
Willem Jan Fokkink ◽  
Anna Ingólfsdóttir ◽  
Sumit Nain

This paper shows that bisimulation equivalence does not afford a finite equational axiomatization over the language obtained by enriching Bergstra and Klop's Basic Process Algebra with the interrupt operator. Moreover, it is shown that the collection of closed equations over this language is also not finitely based. In sharp contrast to these results, the collection of closed equations over the language BPA enriched with the disrupt operator is proven to be finitely based.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimiro Sassone ◽  
Pawel Sobocinski

We introduce a comprehensive operational semantic theory of graph rewriting. The central idea is recasting rewriting frameworks as Leifer and Milner's reactive systems. Consequently, graph rewriting systems are associated with canonical labelled transition systems, on which bisimulation equivalence is a congruence with respect to arbitrary graph contexts (cospans of graphs). This construction is derived from a more general theorem of much wider applicability. Expressed in abstract categorical terms, the central technical contribution of the paper is the construction of groupoidal relative pushouts, introduced and developed by the authors in recent work, in suitable cospan categories over arbitrary adhesive categories. As a consequence, we both generalise and shed light on rewriting via borrowed contexts due to Ehrig and König.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document