scholarly journals Comparison Of Centralized And Decentralized Scheduling Algorithms Using GSSIM Simulation Environment

2008 ◽  
pp. 185-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Krystek ◽  
Krzysztof Kurowski ◽  
Ariel Oleksiak ◽  
Krzysztof Rzadca
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyush Chauhan ◽  
Nitin

Complex problems consisting of interdependent subtasks are represented by a direct acyclic graph (DAG). Subtasks of this DAG are scheduled by the scheduler on various grid resources. Scheduling algorithms for grid strive to optimize the schedule. Nowadays a lot of grid resources are attached by P2P approach. Grid systems and P2P model both are newfangled distributed computing approaches. Combining P2P model and grid systems we get P2P grid systems. P2P grid systems require fully decentralized scheduling algorithm, which can schedule interreliant subtasks among nonuniform computational resources. Absence of central scheduler caused the need for decentralized scheduling algorithm. In this paper we have proposed scheduling algorithm which not only is fruitful in optimizing schedule but also does so in fully decentralized fashion. Hence, this unconventional approach suits well for P2P grid systems. Moreover, this algorithm takes accurate scheduling decisions depending on both computation cost and communication cost associated with DAG’s subtasks.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Abdel-Malek ◽  
Jasbir Arora ◽  
Jingzhou Yang ◽  
Timothy Marler ◽  
Steve Beck ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol E97.B (7) ◽  
pp. 1474-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayoshi IWATA ◽  
Hiroyuki MIYAZAKI ◽  
Fumiyuki ADACHI

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Schmitt ◽  
Ruzica Vujasinovic ◽  
Christiane Edinger ◽  
Julia Zillies ◽  
Vilmar Mollwitz

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1171-1176
Author(s):  
Vanika . ◽  
Aman Kumar Sharma

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
V. Srikanth Reddy ◽  
V. Krishna Reddy

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
NASEERA SHAIK ◽  
JYOTHEESWAI P ◽  
◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document