Neurologic Emergencies After Neurosurgery

Author(s):  
Doortje C. Engel ◽  
Andrew Maas
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Raibagkar ◽  
Anil Ramineni

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Supan ◽  
Lauren Patton ◽  
Julie M Fussner ◽  
Colin Beilman ◽  
Martha Sajatovic

Introduction: University Hospitals Health System (UHHS) has seen an interest by nursing in using simulation and case studies as an adjunct to classroom education to instruct in emergency situations and mock codes. UHHS is currently expanding neuroscience services at 2 community hospitals while maintaining services at the quaternary care hospital. There is a need for further neuroscience education of both experienced nurses who have limited neuroscience exposure and novice nurses employed in neuroscience specialty areas. Patient simulators have been used in a variety of education settings, yet their effectiveness in training nurses to manage neurologic patients and neurologic emergencies has not been widely examined. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the use of high-fidelity simulation on nurses’ assessment skills, critical thinking and comfort in caring for neuroscience patients. Methods: A pre and post survey design was used for this project with nurses completing a survey immediately prior to and after participating in 3 simulation scenarios: intracerebral hemorrhage with intracranial pressure, subdural hematoma with seizures, and brain tumor complicated by pulmonary embolism. After completion of each scenario a debriefing occurred. Surveys allowed nurses to assess their confidence levels in responding to neurologic emergencies using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1= strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Results: Comfort level was assessed in five different categories. Comfort in performing a neurologic assessment improved from a pre-survey average of 4.02 to a post-survey average of 4.59, a variance of 11.4%. Comfort in managing a stroke patient improved from 3.98 to 4.45, a variance of 9.5%. Comfort in administering emergency medications improved from 3.02 to 3.98, a variance of 19.1%. Comfort in identifying neurologic changes improved from 3.82 to 4.43, a variance of 12.3%. Comfort in communicating neurologic changes to the provider improved from 4.00 to 4.66, a variance of 13.2%. There was an overall improvement in the variance in all 5 categories of 13.1%. Conclusion: The use of high-fidelity simulation allowed nurses to gain comfort in assessment, management, and provider communication specific to neuroscience patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-450
Author(s):  
Joseph I. Sirven

Purpose of reviewNeurologists are being asked to offer their services in response to in-flight medical conditions. This review updates the latest understanding of how neurologists should manage in-flight neurologic emergencies should they be called upon to serve. A review of the existing literature was conducted for sharing of best practices in this unique scenario.Recent findingsIn-flight neurologic emergencies are on the rise. This article provides a synthesis of current best practices for in-flight emergencies including epidemiology, airline responsibility, available health care equipment on jetliners, legal ramifications of helping, and pathophysiology of why in-flight neurologic emergencies are so common.SummaryIn-flight neurologic emergencies are common and all physicians are increasingly being asked to respond to in-flight emergencies. Understanding one's responsibility, available equipment, and how to best prevent these scenarios with one's own patients may help to make this complex situation more manageable.


2011 ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
Stephen G. Flynn ◽  
Jeffrey A. Seiden

2011 ◽  
pp. 296-304.e3
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Kochanek ◽  
Michael J. Bell

Author(s):  
Ross P. Martini ◽  
Ines P. Koerner

The primary goal of the neuroanaesthetist and neurointensivist is to preserve brain structure and function, especially in the setting of neurologic insults. Neurologic emergencies can also develop peri-operatively in patients undergoing non-neurosurgical procedures, which the general anaesthetist should be prepared to manage. This chapter on neurologic emergencies discusses herniation syndromes (including pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension, symptoms of herniation, and therapies to reduce intracranial pressure and reverse herniation). It also covers coma (including differential diagnoses of postoperative coma, clinical evaluation of the comatose patient, CT imaging, advanced tests, and directed therapies). Finally, it discusses key aspects of ischaemic stroke, status epilepticus, and transition of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document