Tariff and Science Policies: Applications of a Model of Nationalism

2009 ◽  
pp. 184-186
Author(s):  
D. J. Daly ◽  
S. Globerman
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 016224392110276
Author(s):  
Mary Frank Fox ◽  
Diana Roldan Rueda ◽  
Gerhard Sonnert ◽  
Amanda Nabors ◽  
Sarah Bartel

This article focuses on key features of the use of sex and gender in titles of articles about women, science, and engineering over an important forty-six-year period (1965–2010). The focus is theoretically and empirically consequential. Theoretically, the paper addresses science as a critical case that connects femininity/masculinity to social stratification; and the use of sex and gender as an enduring, analytical issue that reveals perspectives on hierarchies of femininity/masculinity. Empirically, this article identifies the emergence, development, and stabilization of published articles about women, science, and engineering that use sex and gender in their titles. The distinctive method involves search, retrieval, and review of 23,430 articles, using intercoder reliabilities for inclusion/exclusion. This results in a uniquely specified and comprehensive set of articles on our subject and the identification of titles with sex and gender. Findings point to (1) the growth of gender titles, (2) their increase in every field, (3) differing concentrations of sex and gender titles in journals, (4) a span of telling topic areas, and (5) higher citation rates of gender, compared to sex, titles. Broader implications appear in reasons for the growth of gender titles, meanings of topic areas that occur, insights into social inequalities and science policies, and emerging complexities of nonbinary categories of sex/gender.


1978 ◽  
Vol 299 (26) ◽  
pp. 1475-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Greenberg
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 53 (168) ◽  
pp. 323-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean‐Jacques Salomon
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 221 (4614) ◽  
pp. 913-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. KAPLAN
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Manco

<p>Open science policies are a much-discussed issue. This literature review aims to examine the approach given to open science policy in these studies. <b></b></p> The approach given to open science in the selected works has different aspects: policy framing and its geopolitical aspects are described as an asymmetries replication and epistemic governance tool. The main geopolitical aspects of open science policies described in the literature are the relations between international, regional and national policies. There are also different components of open science covered in the literature: open data seems much discussed in the English speaking works while open access is the main component discussed in the Portuguese and Spanish speaking papers. Finally, the relation between open science policies and the general science policy is framed by highlighting the innovation and transparency that open science can bring to it.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel Smith-Doerr

This essay responds to the five articles on Anti-Science in this journal issue by discussing a significant theme identified across all of them: hidden injustice. Some of the ways that injustice is hidden by organizational forces related to anti-science are identified. In response, the essay points to the need for empirical data on anti-science policies, a symmetric approach to anti-science contexts, and institutional analysis of anti-science power imbalances. Additionally, a reflexive question about whether anti-science analysis in STS leads the field toward racial justice is raised. The essay calls for further organizational level research with a critical STS lens to uncover hidden injustice.


Archaeologies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Salazar ◽  
Horacio Ramírez ◽  
Sebastián Yrarrazaval ◽  
Amapola Saball ◽  
Andrés Troncoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document