Some Case Studies in the Application of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis

1980 ◽  
pp. 92-104
Author(s):  
Gavin H. Mooney ◽  
Elizabeth M. Russell ◽  
Roy D. Weir
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis

The Practical Issues and Policy Implications of Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis Through Case Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-89
Author(s):  
Saungah Sau ◽  
Insun Lim ◽  
Sohyun Woo ◽  
Moonsun Kang ◽  
Ssangeun Jo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Cost

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis

2015 ◽  
pp. 636-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Riegg Cellini ◽  
James Edwin Kee
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis

Enhanced Time of Use Electricity Pricing for Industrial Customers in Malaysia

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Azrina Mohd Azman ◽  
Md Pauzi Abdullah ◽  
Mohammad Yusri hasan ◽  
Dalila Mat Said ◽  
Faridah Hussin
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Electricity Consumption ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Electricity Pricing ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Consumption Profile ◽  
Advanced Version ◽  
Daily Time

<p>New Time of Use (ToU) tariff scheme known as Enhanced ToU (EToU) has been introduced on 1st January 2016 for industrial customers in Malaysia. EToU scheme is the advanced version of current ToU where the daily time frame is divided into six period blocks, as compared to only two in the existing ToU. Mid-peak tariff is introduced on top of peak-hour and off-peak tariff. The new scheme is designed to reduce Malaysia’s peak hour electricity demand. On customer side, they could be benefited from the low off-peak tariff by simply shifting their consumption. However, it depends on their consumption profile and their flexibility in shifting their consumption. Since EToU scheme is voluntary, each customer needs to perform cost-benefit analysis before deciding to switch into the scheme. This paper analyzes this problem by considering EToU tariff scheme for industry and customer’s electricity consumption profile. Case studies using different practical data from different industries are presented and discussed in this paper.</p>

The Principles and Objectives of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

1968 ◽  
Vol 72 (685) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Stratton
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Decision Processes ◽  
The Political ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Value For Money ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
National Newspaper ◽  
Is Value

The terms “cost-effectiveness” and to a lesser degree “cost-benefit” analysis have become familiar words in the technical and national press, the former usually in relation to defence projects—the latter in relation to social projects, such as transport, power generation and building. Indeed, at the time of the last General Election the political correspondent of a national newspaper wrote, “Mr. Heath and Mr. Callaghan, Chancellor of the Exchequer, vied with each other in stressing the importance of cost-effectiveness, which used to be known as getting value for money”. The apparently simple concept of “value for money” raises three important issues: (i) how is “value” of defence and social projects quantified? (ii) what is the “money” involved, i.e. what are all the relevant costs? and (iii) what are the information and decision processes that are used in attempting to obtain “value for money“?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document