Therapeutic Alliance and Common Factors in Treatment

Author(s):  
Daniella M. Halperin ◽  
Meara L. Weitzman ◽  
Michael W. Otto
Author(s):  
John C. Markowitz

This chapter reviews the opening sessions of IPT for PTSD. These sessions focus on making a diagnosis, taking a history, setting a frame and a time limit, using an interpersonal context, and initial symptomatic relief. The therapist gives the patient the sick role and elicits an interpersonal inventory. The initial phase culminates in giving the patient an interpersonal formulation focusing on role transition, grief, or role dispute and getting the patient’s agreement to it. This phase sets the stage for the remainder of treatment. The chapter also discusses social supports, the absence of homework, contingencies, therapeutic alliance, “common factors” of psychotherapies, normalizing negative affects, psychoeducation, and taking social risks.


Author(s):  
Julia Browne ◽  
Corinne Cather ◽  
Kim T. Mueser

Common factors, or characteristics that are present across psychotherapies, have long been considered important to fostering positive psychotherapy outcomes. The contextual model offers an overarching theoretical framework for how common factors facilitate therapeutic change. Specifically, this model posits that improvements occur through three primary pathways: (a) the real relationship, (b) expectations, and (c) specific ingredients. The most-well-studied common factors, which also are described within the contextual model, include the therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, positive regard, genuineness, and client expectations. Empirical studies have demonstrated that a strong therapeutic alliance, higher ratings of therapist empathy, positive regard, genuineness, and more favorable outcome expectations are related to improved treatment outcomes. Yet, the long-standing debate continues regarding whether psychotherapy outcomes are most heavily determined by these common factors or by factors specific to the type of therapy used. There have been calls for an integration of the two perspectives and a shift toward evaluating mechanisms as a way to move the field forward. Nonetheless, the common factors are valuable in treatment delivery and should be a focus in delivering psychotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Vicente ◽  
Laura Inês Ferreira ◽  
Antonia María Jiménez-Ros ◽  
Cláudia Carmo ◽  
Luís Janeiro

Purpose This study aims to investigate whether the influence of group cohesion on the outcomes depended on the levels of the therapeutic alliance. Design/methodology/approach Sixteen individuals with a substance use disorder who were undergoing treatment in a therapeutic community responded to therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, craving and outcomes measures after every therapeutic small group session for a period of six weeks. Data analysis was performed using hierarchical linear modeling. Findings Results indicate that the effect of group cohesion is stronger when there is a high therapeutic alliance between resident and therapist. Originality/value Even on group interventions, to enhance group cohesion effects on outcomes, therapists must foster higher therapeutic alliance levels. The findings point out the importance of studying the effect of common factors on outcomes.


1990 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Bourgeois ◽  
Stéphane Sabourin ◽  
John Wright

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 5454 (1414) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Skovholt ◽  
Len Jennings
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. McClintock ◽  
Matthew R. Perlman ◽  
Shannon M. McCarrick ◽  
Timothy Anderson ◽  
Lina Himawan

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Safran ◽  
P. Crocker ◽  
S. McMain ◽  
P. Murray
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester Luborsky ◽  
Jacques Barber ◽  
Lynne Siqueland ◽  
A. Thomas McLellan ◽  
George Woody

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document